2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git
Looks like it is, according to
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/
Rich, I cannot see the tag, either... *puzzled*
$ git pull
Already up-to-date.
$ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil
389-adminutil-1.1.10
389-adminutil-1.1.11
389-adminutil-1.1.12
389-adminutil-1.1.13
389-adminutil-1.1.14
389-adminutil-1.1.15
389-adminutil-1.1.16
389-adminutil-1.1.17
389-adminutil-1.1.18
389-adminutil-1.1.19
389-adminutil-1.1.8
389-adminutil-1.1.9
although indeed this page
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is...
Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from
here. So, you have no problem to continue your task?
I've used the release tarball and packaging is on 9b3cfced24ffe6e6e from
master, so I'm good.. just wondered why the tag wasn't there but it was.
3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't
have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so
doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to
push to the distro?
389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release. It's branched from
the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix. The tag
389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132
branch. Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal
branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2. Sorry about this confusion.
ahh ok, I'll just rebase on .16 then.
Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?
All right. I will do so from the next time. Thanks for your
suggestion!