Richard Megginson wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229077 > Resolves: bug 229077 > Bug Description: Rename fedora-ds to fedora-ds-base (The package > breaks an previous installation of the Fedora DS!!) > Reviewed by: ??? > Files: configure.ac and all generated autotool files > Branch: HEAD > Fix Description: We have decided to rename the new (1.1) fedora-ds to > be fedora-ds-base. This reflects its actual contents since it > contains only the base LDAP server and command line utilities, but > not the console, admin server, webapps, etc. Those will be made > available in separate packages (fedora-ds-admin, fedora-ds-console, > fedora-ds-gw) and so on. > This will also have a ripple effect - FHS path names will change from > *fedora-ds to *fedora-ds-base - the source tarball will be > fedora-ds-base-.... - even the initscript will be invoked like > "service fedora-ds-base restart". The spec file and other source > file changes will also follow this. > Platforms tested: RHEL4, FC6 > Flag Day: Yes. Any reference to fedora-ds will need to change to > fedora-ds-base. > Doc impact: Yes. The wiki docs will have to change any reference to > fedora-ds to fedora-ds-base with respect to fds version 1.1. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148698&action=... > > Do you really need the init script to be fedora-ds-base? There shouldn't be a conflict calling it fedora-ds.

rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel