10:01 a.m.
Hi Guys
I have been attempting to build 389-ds-base 1.2.4 on openSUSE and have found
the configure script makes some assumptions about Berkley DB that are not
valid on SUSE.
The configure script fails with the following error:
configure: checking for db...
checking for --with-db... no
checking for db.h... using /usr/include/db.h
checking for db_create in -ldb-.... no
configure: error: /usr/include/db.h is version . but libdb-. not found
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83160 (%build)
On openSUSE the db packages are the following:
# rpm -ql libdb-4_5
/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.so
# rpm -ql libdb-4_5-devel
/usr/include/db.h
/usr/include/db4
/usr/include/db4/db.h
/usr/include/db4/db_185.h
/usr/include/db_185.h
/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.a
/usr/lib/libdb-4.so
/usr/lib/libdb.a
/usr/lib/libdb.so
# cat /usr/include/db.h
#include <db4/db.h>
# cat /etc/SuSE-release
openSUSE 11.2 (i586)
VERSION = 11.2
The attached patch solves this problem for me, but is almost certain to break
things on Fedora. Hopefully someone with better m4 foo than I can fix it
up...
Regards
--
Peter Nixon
http://peternixon.net/
10:34 a.m.
On 11/12/2009 08:01 AM, Peter Nixon wrote:
Hi Guys
I have been attempting to build 389-ds-base 1.2.4 on openSUSE and have found
the configure script makes some assumptions about Berkley DB that are not
valid on SUSE.
The configure script fails with the following error:
configure: checking for db...
checking for --with-db... no
checking for db.h... using /usr/include/db.h
checking for db_create in -ldb-.... no
configure: error: /usr/include/db.h is version . but libdb-. not found
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83160 (%build)
These steps extract db_libver. If you do these manually, what do you see?
db_incdir=/usr/include
db_ver_maj=`grep DB_VERSION_MAJOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_ver_min=`grep DB_VERSION_MINOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_ver_pat=`grep DB_VERSION_PATCH $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_libver=${db_ver_maj}.${db_ver_min}
Thanks,
--noriko
On openSUSE the db packages are the following:
# rpm -ql libdb-4_5
/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.so
# rpm -ql libdb-4_5-devel
/usr/include/db.h
/usr/include/db4
/usr/include/db4/db.h
/usr/include/db4/db_185.h
/usr/include/db_185.h
/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.a
/usr/lib/libdb-4.so
/usr/lib/libdb.a
/usr/lib/libdb.so
# cat /usr/include/db.h
#include<db4/db.h>
# cat /etc/SuSE-release
openSUSE 11.2 (i586)
VERSION = 11.2
The attached patch solves this problem for me, but is almost certain to break
things on Fedora. Hopefully someone with better m4 foo than I can fix it
up...
Regards
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
11:05 a.m.
Noriko Hosoi wrote:
On 11/12/2009 08:01 AM, Peter Nixon wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I have been attempting to build 389-ds-base 1.2.4 on openSUSE and have found
> the configure script makes some assumptions about Berkley DB that are not
> valid on SUSE.
>
> The configure script fails with the following error:
>
> configure: checking for db...
> checking for --with-db... no
> checking for db.h... using /usr/include/db.h
> checking for db_create in -ldb-.... no
> configure: error: /usr/include/db.h is version . but libdb-. not found
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83160 (%build)
>
These steps extract db_libver. If you do these manually, what do you see?
db_incdir=/usr/include
db_ver_maj=`grep DB_VERSION_MAJOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_ver_min=`grep DB_VERSION_MINOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_ver_pat=`grep DB_VERSION_PATCH $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
db_libver=${db_ver_maj}.${db_ver_min}
I think this is related to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460174 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519459
Thanks,
--noriko
> On openSUSE the db packages are the following:
>
> # rpm -ql libdb-4_5
> /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.so
>
> # rpm -ql libdb-4_5-devel
> /usr/include/db.h
> /usr/include/db4
> /usr/include/db4/db.h
> /usr/include/db4/db_185.h
> /usr/include/db_185.h
> /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.a
> /usr/lib/libdb-4.so
> /usr/lib/libdb.a
> /usr/lib/libdb.so
>
> # cat /usr/include/db.h
> #include <db4/db.h>
>
> # cat /etc/SuSE-release
> openSUSE 11.2 (i586)
> VERSION = 11.2
>
> The attached patch solves this problem for me, but is almost certain to break
> things on Fedora. Hopefully someone with better m4 foo than I can fix it
> up...
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
2:45 p.m.
On Thu 12 Nov 2009, Rich Megginson wrote:
Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 08:01 AM, Peter Nixon wrote:
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> I have been attempting to build 389-ds-base 1.2.4 on openSUSE and have
>> found the configure script makes some assumptions about Berkley DB that
>> are not valid on SUSE.
>>
>> The configure script fails with the following error:
>>
>> configure: checking for db...
>> checking for --with-db... no
>> checking for db.h... using /usr/include/db.h
>> checking for db_create in -ldb-.... no
>> configure: error: /usr/include/db.h is version . but libdb-. not found
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.83160 (%build)
>
> These steps extract db_libver. If you do these manually, what do you
> see? db_incdir=/usr/include
> db_ver_maj=`grep DB_VERSION_MAJOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
> db_ver_min=`grep DB_VERSION_MINOR $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
> db_ver_pat=`grep DB_VERSION_PATCH $db_incdir/db.h | awk '{print $3}'`
> db_libver=${db_ver_maj}.${db_ver_min}
I think this is related to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460174 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519459
Yes. On SUSE the file "/usr/include/db.h" contains only the line "#include
<db4/db.h>". The actual header file is at "/usr/include/db4/db.h". My
patch
simply changes configure so that it awks the version from
"/usr/include/db4/db.h" instead of "/usr/include/db.h". This will
obviously
break for people who don't have a "/usr/include/db4/db.h" file (Fedora
obviously) so the patch needs to be made more intelligent to work on both
Fedora and SUSE, however for now I am able to build rpms for SUSE which is
what I needed. (They will be up on the openSUSE mirrors shortly)
Cheers
--
Peter Nixon
http://peternixon.net/
5273
days inactive
5273
days old
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Noriko Hosoi -
Peter Nixon -
Rich Megginson