Please comment: [389 Project] #48404: /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libnunc-stans.so is owned by both -libs and -devel
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
William raised a good point in fixing this ticket #48404.
We have *.so and *.so.* (*.so # & *.so.#.#.#) for libraries. I assumed
*.so should be in 389-ds-base-devel and *.so.* should be in
389-ds-base-libs. But it is not needed to be like that? He proposed to
put all the .so and .so.* files in -libs and none in -devel.
We are currently discussing about libnunc-stans.so* and libslapd.so*. I
see another one libns-dshttpd.so* which are all in -libs.
Thanks,
--noriko
On 05/29/2016 04:11 PM, 389 Project wrote:
#48404: /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libnunc-stans.so is owned by both -libs and
-devel
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nhosoi | Owner:
Type: defect | firstyear
Priority: major | Status:
Component: Directory Server | assigned
Resolution: | Milestone: 1.3.5.5
Blocked By: | Version:
Review: review? | Keywords:
Red Hat Bugzilla: | Blocking:
[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257568| Ticket origin:
1257568] | Community
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by firstyear):
You also need to change a later line:
{{{
%{_libdir}/%{pkgname}/libslapd.so.*
TO
%{_libdir}/%{pkgname}/libslapd.so*
}}}
Else it won't match libslapd.so into -libs.
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 12:49 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
William raised a good point in fixing this ticket #48404.
We have *.so and *.so.* (*.so # & *.so.#.#.#) for libraries. I assumed
*.so should be in 389-ds-base-devel and *.so.* should be in
389-ds-base-libs. But it is not needed to be like that? He proposed to
put all the .so and .so.* files in -libs and none in -devel.
We are currently discussing about libnunc-stans.so* and libslapd.so*. I
see another one libns-dshttpd.so* which are all in -libs.
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Apr 14 10:22 libslapd.so -> libslapd.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Apr 14 10:22 libslapd.so.0 -> libslapd.so.0.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6403918 Apr 14 10:22 libslapd.so.0.0.0
Basically, if we looked at -devel in isolation, it requires -libs to function.
But -devel provides a .so symlink, and we may have some application that looks for that.
We should require -devel for an
application to find our library.
That's why I'd rather just see all the .so objects in -libs, and leave -devel to
be our headers.
There are going to be three (or maybe more) use cases:
DS install (maybe with external plugins using the .so files):
* 389-ds-base
* 389-ds-base-libs
DS developer (maybe making plugins?)
* 389-ds-base
* 389-ds-base-libs
* 389-ds-base-devel
Plugin developer, or some other development
* 389-ds-base-libs
* 389-ds-base-devel
In all, they will all need 389-ds-base-libs which is why we should put all the .so there.
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
2881
days inactive
2881
days old
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Noriko Hosoi -
William Brown