389, Active Directory, PassSync, Multi-Masters, and multiple AD servers
by Anne (juniper) Cross
We have two AD servers, and we're working on having four 389 Masters
geographically distributed, multi-mastered between them, etc, etc, etc.
The goal here is to stop having network hiccups take things out.
The AD servers talk to each other nigh-on instantaneously. Likewise for
the 389 servers. Is it safe to set up sync agreements to *both* AD
servers, in case one goes down? Likewise, is it safe to set up an
agreement to a single AD server on multiple masters, in case we lose one
master?
And for further fun, do I need to install PassSync on both AD servers?
Our windows admin wants to set it up on the password server, and the
documentation on RedHat's site doesn't say it specifically needs to be
on the AD box, but I'm wondering what happens if the password changes
circumvent the password server (an admin manually changes someone's
password on the AD server, for example.)
-- juniper (this is moderately hairy, but once it's worked out, I
will never need to touch it again, I hope)
--
,___,
{o,o} Anne "Juniper" Cross
(___) Senior Linux Systems Engineer and Extropic Crusader
-"-"-- Information Technology, ITA Software
/^^^
14 years, 6 months
Schema Question
by David Partridge
We need to add in the pkiCA, pkiUser, and deltaCRL ObjectClasses to be
in compliance with RFC 4523 to our DS builds.
Are these subset of objectClasses from RFC 4523 for Compliance with RFC
4523? If these are correct I will continue this to make recommended
changes for the Attribute and ObjectClasses defined in RFC 4523 for
00core.ldif in conjunction to my testing to propose to the 389
community.
objectClasses: ( 2.5.6.22 NAME 'pkiCA' DESC 'X.509 PKI Certificate
Authority' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY ( cACertificate $
certificateRevocationList $ authorityRevocationList $
crossCertificatePair ) X-ORIGIN 'RFC 4523' )
objectClasses: ( 2.5.6.23 NAME 'deltaCRL' DESC 'X.509 delta CRL' SUP top
AUXILIARY MAY deltaRevocationList X-ORIGIN 'RFC 4523')
objectClasses: ( 2.5.6.21 NAME 'pkiUser' DESC 'X.509 PKI User' SUP top
AUXILIARY MAY userCertificate X-ORIGIN 'RFC 4523')
Thanks
David M. Partridge
14 years, 6 months
Password expiration warning
by Andrew Kerr
I am hoping to implement password expirations using 389. 389 is used
for system level auth across a few hundred redhat5 servers, but is also
used for web auth, and primarily so for less technical users (access to
Wiki, internal accounting systems, etc).
What I'm struggling with is how users will be notified of their upcoming
password expiration if they don't directly log in to a Unix box. 389
has a check box to "send warning X days before password expires", but I
can't find any documentation on what exactly that means. How are they
notified - via email? If not, is there already a script out in the wild
that will scan my LDAP for upcoming expirations (via cron) and email
notifications to users?
Thanks!
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
14 years, 6 months
Multimaster replication
by Juan Asensio Sánchez
Hi
Has 389DS any limit of servers for multimaster replication? If so,
what is the best option to have any number of servers with read/write
databases and replication agreements among them?
Regards.
14 years, 6 months
Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
by Ankur Agarwal
I want to achieve chaining between a master and slave having exactly same OUs and are based on OpenLDAP 2.3.
What would be the configuration to achieve that?
Regards,
Ankur
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Ankur Agarwal wrote:
Thanks Rich...Would it be possible for you to share some configuration details to achieve this for OpenLDAP version 2.3?
To achieve what exactly for OpenLDAP 2.3? Chain from 389 to OpenLDAP?
Cheers,
A
--- On *Mon, 10/12/09, Rich Megginson /<rmeggins(a)redhat.com>/* wrote:
From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
project." <fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com>
Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 10:47 AM
Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different
"ou"?
> I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set
of OUs
> can i still have chaining between master and slave?
>
Yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Ankur
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Ströder /<michael(a)stroeder.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael@stroeder.com>>/*
wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=michael@stroeder.com>>
> Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
> project." <fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=fedora-directory-users@redha...>>
> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM
>
> Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> >
> > I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always
being
> done to
> > the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to
read some
> data
> > immediately after write, and my read request goes to the
slave.
> It fails
> > in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to
slave before
> > this read operation.
>
> You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you
have to
> rely on the
> consistency of what you recently wrote to the master.
>
> > Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation?
> > Can chaining help in this case?
>
> No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing client to
> the master
> which you don't want I guess).
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)redhat.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@redhat.com>
> <http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)redhat.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)redhat.com
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
14 years, 6 months
An Error i can not trace back
by Anton Engelhardt
Hi,
first of all, I'm running gentoo linux and tried to install the 389-ds,
and as far as i see the ldap server itself runs. I just can't get the
398-webadmin to work. I think i have tracked down the error to the
mod_admserv.so apache2 module. When i comment it out the apache runs.
Not doing so gives me the following startup Information:
/usr/sbin/apache2 -D DEFAULT_VHOST -D LANGUAGE -D INFO -d
/usr/lib/apache2 -f /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/httpd.conf -e debug -k restart
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
restartd_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module nss_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
admserv_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2485): [25521]
create_server_config [0xbogus %p for (null)
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2473): [25521]
create_config [0xbogus %p for (null)
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
actions_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module alias_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
auth_basic_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_anon_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_dbd_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_dbm_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_default_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authn_file_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_dbm_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_default_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_groupfile_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_host_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_owner_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
authz_user_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
autoindex_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module dbd_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module dir_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module env_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
expires_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
ext_filter_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
filter_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
headers_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module ident_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
imagemap_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
include_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module mime_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
mime_magic_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
negotiation_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
rewrite_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
setenvif_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
speling_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
usertrack_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
vhost_alias_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module cgid_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
log_config_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module logio_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module
unique_id_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_so.c(246): loaded module info_module
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2544): [25521] Set
[0xbogus %p [ADMCacheLifeTime] to 600
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2562): [25521] Set
[0xbogus %p [ADMServerVersionString] to 389-Administrator/1.1.8
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2473): [25521]
create_config [0xbogus %p for /*/[tT]asks/[Oo]peration/*
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2473): [25521]
create_config [0xbogus %p for /*/[tT]asks/[Cc]onfiguration/*
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2473): [25521]
create_config [0xbogus %p for
/*/[tT]asks/[Oo]peration/(?i:stop|start|restart|startconfigds|create|remove)$
additionaly i get the following in the dirserv-admin log:
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2419): Entering
mod_admserv_post_config - pid is [25521] init count is [0]
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2248): Entering
do_admserv_post_config - pid is [25521]
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2256): Entering
do_admserv_post_config - init count is [1]
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [debug] mod_admserv.c(2280): [25521] Cache
expiration set to 600 seconds
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [crit] do_admserv_post_config(): unable to
create AdmldapInfo
Configuration Failed
[Tue Oct 20 09:15:37 2009] [info] Shutting down SSL Session ID Cache
google doesn't give me any usable results und nobody in the #389 irc
seems to be able to answer. Even though I'm not running Fedora nor
Redhat i would be glad to recive some Information about solving this
issue or to be able to trace back the reason for this error.
Thanks in advance
14 years, 6 months
Searching cn=config as a user other than cn=Directory Manager?
by Anne (juniper) Cross
I'm working on setting up nagios monitoring of our multi-master
replication, and given the occasional problems that are plaguing our
network, we need replication monitoring. The script on
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:ReplicationMonitoring#Monit...
is very helpful, but it assumes logging in as the Directory Manager.
We've had sufficient problems with "helpful" people becoming root and
doing things that I'm *really* wary of putting the Directory Manager
password in plaintext in a monitoring script, but searching as
cn=replication,cn=config or similar results doesn't return any results.
Can someone point me at the ACI I need to modify (or do I need to create
a new one?) to add read-only access to cn=config on our master servers
for monitoring purposes? Thanks!
-- juniper
--
,___,
{o,o} Anne "Juniper" Cross
(___) Senior Linux Systems Engineer and Extropic Crusader
-"-"-- Information Technology, ITA Software
/^^^
14 years, 6 months
Issue for operation that use proxy user
by Bisegni Claudio
Hi all,
i'm writing a middle tier that use a ldap pooled connection to 389
directory server.
The connection are made using Application Server special user for bind
operation. When an user is authenticated, all the operation are made
using the special user polled connection that use the current logged
user as proxy user. The DN for the Application Server user have only
privilege to read and make proxy.
This is the scenario and with this i have two issue.
1) using the proxy user i can't write the userPassword Attribute but i
can do all operation on all other attribute(the user used for proxy
have all privilege on all the tree) the error i receive is:
'Insufficient 'write' privilege to the 'userPassword' attribute of
entry 'infnuuid=31e4ebe9-36c2-4244-
b00c-18e6e87fe407,ou=people,dc=infn,dc=it'
If i get a connection making the bind with this user, all work. All
other operation except add or modify "userPassword" attribute work
well using the proxy user as aspected(so proxy is working)
2)for all other operation that work using the proxy user the problem
is that on 389 log is shown only the real and not the proxy one. Can
be 389 server configured to shown the real and proxy user, to log the
operation?
Thanks in advanced.
Best Reguards
Claudio Bisegni
14 years, 6 months
wied problems
by Hendry, Chris
Had two FDS 1.03 replicating for months.
Just recently, one stopped replicating
And when I try and bring up the Fedora Management Console, no server appears, just blank.
Any direction would be most appreciated.
errors log file:
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:16 -0400] - Fedora-Directory/1.0.4 B2006.312.1539 starting up
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:18 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set referrals for replica dc=xxxx,dc=xxxx: 1
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:18 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:18 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 13, string="ðÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:18 -0400] - slapd started. Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP requests
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:19 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 48), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:19 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 47), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:19 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 48), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:19 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 47), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:20 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 48), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:20 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 47), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:20 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 48), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:39:20 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 47), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="XÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="P¶ ctClass"
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:40:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:12 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 51), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:12 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 52), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 48), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 47), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 89), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 88), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 90), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 88), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 91), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 88), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 80), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 80), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 95), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 95), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:49 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 92), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:41:50 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 83), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="ȉ! "
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string=" "
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:42:23 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="àØS "
[15/Oct/2009:09:43:37 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:43:37 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="Ø6S "
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="XÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:45:02 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="PÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:46:59 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="0S ctClass"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:00 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="PÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="PÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="PÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="XÑ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:01 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:08 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:47:08 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="ØÒ`"
[15/Oct/2009:09:50:25 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:50:25 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string=""
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string="H"
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - str2entry_fast: entry has no dn
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - str2entry returned NULL for id 485, string=" t ctClass"
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 485), but it did not exist in id2entry.
[15/Oct/2009:09:51:10 -0400] - dn2entry: the dn was in the entrydn index (id 487), but it did not exist in id2entry.
14 years, 6 months
