Problem with SSL replication
by Riss Nicolas
Hi,
I have three 389d server in MMR and I have a replication problem with one of them.
I'm unable to initialize the replication agrement over TLS with one server that is on a remote location. It works between the two other which are on the same location. I have the following line in the error.log :
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:20.648989852 +0200] - ERR - factory_destructor - ERROR bulk import abandoned
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:20.669025629 +0200] - ERR - bdb_import_run_pass - import userRoot: Thread monitoring returned: -23
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:20.669478537 +0200] - ERR - bdb_public_bdb_import_main - import userRoot: Aborting all Import threads...
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:26.577068783 +0200] - ERR - bdb_public_bdb_import_main - import userRoot: Import threads aborted.
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:26.577500221 +0200] - INFO - bdb_public_bdb_import_main - import userRoot: Closing files...
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:26.778812943 +0200] - ERR - bdb_public_bdb_import_main - import userRoot: Import failed.
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:26.845658223 +0200] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - consumer_connection_extension_destructor - Aborting total update in progress for replicated area dc=XXXX,dc=XXXX,dc=XX connid=22
[08/Jun/2024:18:03:26.847637329 +0200] - ERR - process_bulk_import_op - NULL target sdn
I have try to export/import the database and then activate the replication, it works for a few minutes and then it stops working. Initialising the agrement without TLS is working.
Version : 2.4.5-1 on OEL9
Thanks
Nicolas Riss
1 week
- 2
- 1
advice on 389 in production
by Morgan Jones
Hello Everyone,
What operating system and 389 version is everyone running in production? We are finally updating our CentOS 7 servers in earnest.
We have almost 200,000 users and use 389 for our central ldap so stability is preferred over features.
Based on release dates I'm leaning toward version 2.x.
I've sent the afternoon trying to find packages for Rocky Linux 9 with limited success.
We switched to Ubuntu a few years ago so that would be my preference but I don't see packages for ubuntu and I'd prefer to now maintain my own packages.
Is Docker a viable option for a production install? I see there is an up to date image which I've been able to start but it appears to be 3.x (see above re: preferred production version).
Thanks,
-morgan
1 week, 2 days
- 4
- 3
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →