On 12/23/2011 01:57 AM, Andrey Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
The entryDN OID from the 389 schema (back-ldbm.h:#define
LDBM_ENTRYDN_OID "2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.602") is different from
that defined by RFC5020 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5020,
"Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.1.20"). Is it an intended difference?
No, it just means we haven't yet caught up to that rfc
Are there any technical reasons why it should be
different?
We don't implement the component filter extensible matching rule for
entrydn. For other usage, as long as you use the attribute type
name and not the oid you should be fine.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users