That works!

Thanks Noriko - much appreciated!

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/23/2015 04:12 PM, Joel Levin wrote:
Hi All:

I inserted the first ACI with an IP Address restriction: tested from all angles but seems to fail when the IP address restricted added.

ACI template:

(targetattr = "foobar") (version 3.0;acl "redcap-svc REDCap SA Read Only";allow (read,compare,search)(userdn = "ldap:///example") and (dns="123.123.123.123");)
What happens if you use "ip" instead of "dns" as in this example?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/Managing_Access_Control-Access_Control_Usage_Examples.html

13.9.6.1. ACI "HostedCompany1"

In LDIF, to grant HostedCompany1 full access to their own branch of the directory under the requisite conditions, write the following statement:
aci:(target="ou=HostedCompany1,ou=corporate-clients,dc=example,dc=com")
     (targetattr= "*") (version 3.0; acl "HostedCompany1";allow (all)
     (roledn="ldap:///cn=DirectoryAdmin,ou=HostedCompany1,
     ou=corporate-clients,dc=example,dc=com") and
     (authmethod="ssl") and (dayofweek="Mon,Tues,Wed,Thu") and (timeofday >= "0800" and
     timeofday <= "1800") and (ip="255.255.123.234"); )

Is there an additional configuration to set for IP address restriction to take hold in 389 DS?

Thanks.


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users