I was under the impression FDS was better implementation than OpenLDAP in terms of Performance, Reliability, and especially replication?
On 7/21/07, Gordon Messmer <yinyang@eburg.com> wrote:
Richard Megginson wrote:
> Vampire D wrote:
>> As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a
>> high load.
> OpenLDAP 2.3 does.
Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument.
He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software
that matters."
Do you agree? Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the
Free Software directory service market? Will the two projects share
technology and converge?
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?"
Christopher