Sorry, I think I'm following now. Instead of syncing the dnanextvalue
between servers, each server should have a range that doesn't overlap
with the other.
On 2013-07-30 12:36, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 10:19 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
> Each server does have the same range, yes,
Why?
> however the first server was configured about a month before the
> second was even stood up. Here is the ldif that I used on the new
> server; the same ldif was used on the original server:
>
> dn: cn=UID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
> Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: extensibleObject
> cn: UID numbers
> dnatype: uidNumber
> dnamagicregen: 99999
> dnafilter: (objectclass=posixAccount)
> dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
> dnanextvalue: 10000
>
> dn: cn=GID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
> Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: extensibleObject
> cn: GID numbers
> dnatype: gidNumber
> dnamagicregen: 88888
> dnafilter: (|(objectclass=posixAccount)(objectclass=posixGroup))
> dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
> dnanextvalue: 10000
>
> The difference is that the dnanextvalue on the original server is now
> up to around ~10080.
>
> Kyle
>
>
> On 2013-07-30 11:00, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 08:48 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>> If it has the patch, what would be causing my dnanextvalue fields to
>>> not be in sync? They're using the local value of the dnanextvalue,
>>> and when adding a new user, the UID and GID are at the beginning of
>>> the local value instead of matching the value on the other server.
>>
>> How did you configure DNA? Note that configuration under cn=config
>> does not replicate to other servers. Does each server have the same
>> range?
>>
>>>
>>> On 2013-07-30 10:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>> On 07/30/2013 08:41 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>>> Sorry, I should know better. 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Then yes, it has that patch.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-07-30 10:38, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/30/2013 08:09 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>> I have found this bug
>>>>>>> (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514955), with a
>>>>>>> patch that appears to have been applied back in 2009.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would that patch have made it into 389?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What version of 389-ds-base are you using?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013-07-29 15:20, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The DNA plugin has been setup on my first server for a
while
>>>>>>>> now and
>>>>>>>> has been working fine.
>>>>>>>> I've added a second server to the environment and
configured it
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> multi-master. After setting up the plugin on that server
and
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> adding a test user to it, the UID is starting at the
bottom of
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> dnanextvalue. I would like for dnanextvalue to stay in
sync
>>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>>> each server in a multi-master environment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you do this? Am I missing something obvious?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>>> -- 389 users mailing list
>>>>>>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>>>>> -- 389 users mailing list
>>>>>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users