Some pros with SLAMD include:<br>1. Detailed resource statistics are built-in<br>2. It came with a relatively large set of tests.<br>3. Addition of new tests are relatively easy with some Java skills<br><br>Anh,<br><br><b><i>David Boreham &lt;david_list@boreham.org&gt;</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Chun Tat David Chu wrote:<br>&gt; Can anyone recommend any tools that are available for testing LDAP?<br>SLAMD is popular, but I still like to use the simple command line<br>tools like rsearch and its siblings :<br>http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6400-10/rsearch.html<br>http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5615-10/srchrate.htm<br>http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5615-10/modrate.htm<br>http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5615-10/authrate.htm<br>http://docs.sun.com/source/816-5615-10/infadd.htm<br><br>For me it's easier to craft a workload matching my requirements<br>using these
 tools.<br><br><br><br>--<br>Fedora-directory-users mailing list<br>Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com<br>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users<br></blockquote><br><BR><BR>