Hi Mark,
Thank you for the quick response. I’m just beginning to unravel the mysteries of
replication, so I really appreciate an expert’s help.
As you can see in the screenshot, the max db csn is quite a bit ahead. Is that an
indication of a problem? Should the server not try to minimize the difference? I’m
theorizing that some of the changes that might occur should not be replicated — causing
the RUV maxcsn to increase but not the agreement’s?
Also, the Last Modify Time column for some servers shows “1/1/1970 00:00:00”. I’ve
verified that that’s how it comes from the search query. What’s that an indication of?
Thank you
Sergei
On Oct 29, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Mark Reynolds
<mareynol(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2017 03:20 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> My question now is: what’s the difference between the maxcsn of the
> agreement and the maxcsn in the RUV?
The maxcsn in the RUV is where the database is at, the agreement maxcsn
is what the repl agreement has processed.