> Is that not a correct way to search for RUVs (both local and
agreements’)? I get the same results as in the code
Right, entries under cn=config are not "special entries". Only the database
tombstone/RUV entry is. So to see a backend database RUV you need to use
"(&(nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff)(objectClass=nsTombstone))",
but you don't need any "special filter" to search for entries under
cn=config.
Thanks, Mark!