however the first server was configured about a month before the
second was even stood up. Here is the ldif that I used on the new
server; the same ldif was used on the original server:
dn: cn=UID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
cn: UID numbers
dnatype: uidNumber
dnamagicregen: 99999
dnafilter: (objectclass=posixAccount)
dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
dnanextvalue: 10000
dn: cn=GID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
cn: GID numbers
dnatype: gidNumber
dnamagicregen: 88888
dnafilter: (|(objectclass=posixAccount)(objectclass=posixGroup))
dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
dnanextvalue: 10000
The difference is that the dnanextvalue on the original server is now
up to around ~10080.
Kyle
On 2013-07-30 11:00, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 07/30/2013 08:48 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>> If it has the patch, what would be causing my dnanextvalue fields to
>> not be in sync? They're using the local value of the dnanextvalue,
>> and when adding a new user, the UID and GID are at the beginning of
>> the local value instead of matching the value on the other server.
>
> How did you configure DNA? Note that configuration under cn=config
> does not replicate to other servers. Does each server have the same
> range?
>
>>
>> On 2013-07-30 10:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 07/30/2013 08:41 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I should know better. 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.x86_64
>>>
>>> Then yes, it has that patch.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2013-07-30 10:38, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>> On 07/30/2013 08:09 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>>>> I have found this bug
>>>>>> (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514955), with a
>>>>>> patch that appears to have been applied back in 2009.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would that patch have made it into 389?
>>>>>
>>>>> What version of 389-ds-base are you using?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2013-07-29 15:20, Kyle Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The DNA plugin has been setup on my first server for a while
>>>>>>> now and
>>>>>>> has been working fine.
>>>>>>> I've added a second server to the environment and
configured it as
>>>>>>> multi-master. After setting up the plugin on that server and
then
>>>>>>> adding a test user to it, the UID is starting at the bottom
of the
>>>>>>> dnanextvalue. I would like for dnanextvalue to stay in sync
>>>>>>> between
>>>>>>> each server in a multi-master environment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you do this? Am I missing something obvious?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>> -- 389 users mailing list
>>>>>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>>>> -- 389 users mailing list
>>>>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users