2:54 p.m.
Hi all,
Are there source RPMs available for Fedora DS v1.0.2?
I need to build a version for the Opteron architecture.
Regards,
Graham
--
3:38 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:26, Graham Leggett wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> the x86_64 is for opteron
When I installed it, I got this:
[root@s83005 rpms]# rpm -U fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.RHEL4.x86_64.opt.rpm
package fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.RHEL4 is intended for a x86_64
architecture
Regards,
Graham
--
then you have a x86 32bit distro installed and need to use the i386 packages
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
4:27 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:41, Graham Leggett wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> then you have a x86 32bit distro installed and need to use the i386
> packages
Hmmm... will check it out, thanks for confirming this for me.
Regards,
Graham
--
a good indication will be
rpm -q --queryformat "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n" glibc
if you have a 64 bit os you should get something like
glibc-2.3.90-38.x86_64
glibc-2.3.90-38.i686
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore RHCE
Network Manager
Royal Publishing
(309)693-3171 x299
7620 N. Harker Drive
Peoria IL 61615
Fedora Core release 4 (Rawhide)
15:42:45 up 7:27, 7 users, load average: 0.56, 0.47, 0.56
4:33 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:41, Graham Leggett wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> then you have a x86 32bit distro installed and need to use the i386
> packages
Hmmm... will check it out, thanks for confirming this for me.
Regards,
Graham
--
a good indication will be
rpm -q --queryformat "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n" glibc
if you have a 64 bit os you should get something like
glibc-2.3.90-38.x86_64
glibc-2.3.90-38.i686
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
4:24 p.m.
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 14:54, Graham Leggett wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Are there source RPMs available for Fedora DS v1.0.2?
>
>I need to build a version for the Opteron architecture.
>
>Regards,
>Graham
>--
>
>
the x86_64 is for opteron
If you want to build it yourself the information is here -
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
In a nutshell:
wget http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
tar xfz dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
cd dsbuild-fds102/meta/ds
make 2>&1 | tee build.log
Use make BUILD_RPM=1 to make an RPM (default is an installable setuputil
package), use DEBUG=full to produce a debug build (default is optimize).
4:35 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:24, Richard Megginson wrote:
If you want to build it yourself the information is here -
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
In a nutshell:
wget http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
tar xfz dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
cd dsbuild-fds102/meta/ds
make 2>&1 | tee build.log
Use make BUILD_RPM=1 to make an RPM (default is an installable setuputil
package), use DEBUG=full to produce a debug build (default is optimize).
How well do you think a build would go on sparc linux?
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
4:42 p.m.
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:24, Richard Megginson wrote:
>If you want to build it yourself the information is here -
>http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
>
>In a nutshell:
>wget http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>tar xfz dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>cd dsbuild-fds102/meta/ds
>make 2>&1 | tee build.log
>
>Use make BUILD_RPM=1 to make an RPM (default is an installable setuputil
>package), use DEBUG=full to produce a debug build (default is optimize).
>
>
How well do you think a build would go on sparc linux?
What OS? I've never tried it, but RHEL or Fedora Core should work.
4:58 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:42, Richard Megginson wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:24, Richard Megginson wrote:
>>If you want to build it yourself the information is here -
>>http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
>>
>>In a nutshell:
>>wget http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>>tar xfz dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>>cd dsbuild-fds102/meta/ds
>>make 2>&1 | tee build.log
>>
>>Use make BUILD_RPM=1 to make an RPM (default is an installable setuputil
>>package), use DEBUG=full to produce a debug build (default is optimize).
>
>How well do you think a build would go on sparc linux?
What OS? I've never tried it, but RHEL or Fedora Core should work.
Aurora
SPARC Linux its a port of Fedora to SPARC.
I guess ill give it a go and see what happens
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore RHCE
Network Manager
Royal Publishing
(309)693-3171 x299
7620 N. Harker Drive
Peoria IL 61615
Fedora Core release 4 (Rawhide)
16:57:30 up 8:42, 6 users, load average: 0.98, 1.07, 1.21
5 p.m.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:42, Richard Megginson wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:24, Richard Megginson wrote:
>>If you want to build it yourself the information is here -
>>http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build
>>
>>In a nutshell:
>>wget http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/sources/dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>>tar xfz dsbuild-fds102.tar.gz
>>cd dsbuild-fds102/meta/ds
>>make 2>&1 | tee build.log
>>
>>Use make BUILD_RPM=1 to make an RPM (default is an installable setuputil
>>package), use DEBUG=full to produce a debug build (default is optimize).
>
>How well do you think a build would go on sparc linux?
What OS? I've never tried it, but RHEL or Fedora Core should work.
Aurora
SPARC Linux its a port of Fedora to SPARC.
I guess ill give it a go and see what happens
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
6635
days inactive
6635
days old
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Dennis Gilmore -
Dennis Gilmore -
Graham Leggett -
Rich Megginson