Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 4:25 PM Rosario Esposito <rosario.esposito(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I have a question.
With EPEL8 modular, when I want to do a fresh 389ds installation i use the
command:
dnf module install 389-directory-server:stable/default
which provides 389ds version 2.0.15
Now, if I do a fresh installation using copr, there is no "stable" tag. If
I just do a:
dnf install 389-ds-base
it provides 389ds version 2.2.4
So, it seems using copr also means upgrading 389ds from 2.0.x version to
2.2.x. version.
Yes, this is correct. This copr follows releases of 389ds that appear in
the latest stable Fedora version. We also have 389-directory-server-next
copr that follows Fedora Rawhide.
F37: 2.2.x
F38/Rawhide: 2.3.x
Once F38 becomes the new stable release, 2.3.x version will appear in
389-directory-server copr.
I see there are 4 currently 389ds releases:
2.0.x
2.1.x
2.2.x
2.3.x
There is also a 1.4.3.x version as part of the 389-ds module. It doesn't
have
WebUI and is intended to be used as part of the idm module. But you
can install it anyway:
dnf module enable 389-ds:1.4
dnf install 389-ds-base
What is in general the suggested/recommended 389ds version to be
installed
EL8-based (Almalinux, RockyLinux, etc.) production systems ?
On RHEL8 I'd recommend using RHDS :)
On EL8 distros a good choice is whatever version is in 389-directory-server
copr, it's well tested and is very close to the latest RHDS version on
RHEL9.
HTH
Thanks,
Rosario
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Viktor