On 12/23/2011 01:57 AM, Andrey Ivanov wrote:
The entryDN OID from the 389 schema (back-ldbm.h:#define
LDBM_ENTRYDN_OID "2.16.840.1.113718.104.22.1682") is different from that
defined by RFC5020 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5020
Identifier: 22.214.171.124.1.20"). Is it an intended difference?
No, it just means we
haven't yet caught up to that rfc
Are there any technical reasons why it should be different?
don't implement the component filter extensible matching rule for
entrydn. For other usage, as long as you use the attribute type name
and not the oid you should be fine.
389 users mailing list