Hi guys!
What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages:
# cat /etc/issue CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
# rpm -qa 389* 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64
I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions for Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on the bleeding edge. Does that make sense?
Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats that I need to be cognizant of?
thank you!
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 13:23 -0600, Derek Belcher wrote:
Hi guys!
What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64
I *think* this corresponds to RHDS 9. Perhaps read the docs on access.redhat.com to get an idea of the versions as I believe they may list the exact 389-ds-base version that matches.
I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions for Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on the bleeding edge. Does that make sense?
Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats that I need to be cognizant of?
Even on centos 7 you would not be on the bleeding edge. The team is very careful about all commits, and review, as well as testing thoroughly what we do (Have a look at the project trac to see what I mean). Only at certain stages do we backport fixes to the "stable" versions. Finally, the "newer" versions such as 1.3.X, will be getting the same fixes as 1.2.X, so really you gain very little from running an older version. Bleeding edge is checking out and running git master, and even then, I feel very confident running that on some of my systems. :)
So you would be very safe running el7 and 389-ds-base 1.3.X that is available there, and I encourage you to!
Sincerely,
William Brown,
William,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate it.
--Derek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:54 AM, William Brown william@blackhats.net.au wrote:
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 13:23 -0600, Derek Belcher wrote:
Hi guys!
What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64
I *think* this corresponds to RHDS 9. Perhaps read the docs on access.redhat.com to get an idea of the versions as I believe they may list the exact 389-ds-base version that matches.
I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions
for
Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on
the
bleeding edge. Does that make sense?
Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats
that
I need to be cognizant of?
Even on centos 7 you would not be on the bleeding edge. The team is very careful about all commits, and review, as well as testing thoroughly what we do (Have a look at the project trac to see what I mean). Only at certain stages do we backport fixes to the "stable" versions. Finally, the "newer" versions such as 1.3.X, will be getting the same fixes as 1.2.X, so really you gain very little from running an older version. Bleeding edge is checking out and running git master, and even then, I feel very confident running that on some of my systems. :)
So you would be very safe running el7 and 389-ds-base 1.3.X that is available there, and I encourage you to!
Sincerely,
William Brown,
389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
I think as a general rule of thumb:
RHEL 5 = RHDS 8
RHEL 6 = RHDS 9
RHEL 7 = RHDS 10
Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whitney@mac.com Sent from my browser.
On Nov 17, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Derek Belcher jderekbelcher@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys!
What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages:
# cat /etc/issue CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
# rpm -qa 389* 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64
I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions for Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on the bleeding edge. Does that make sense?
Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats that I need to be cognizant of?
thank you! -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Derek Belcher -
Paul Whitney -
William Brown