i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message -------- From: Noriko Hosoi nhosoi@redhat.com Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
Thank you for the update.
Regarding this symptom:
they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550).
I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest.
Thanks, --noriko
On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5
I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD. BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts.
Thanks,
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:23 AM To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1 Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)?
rpm -q 389-ds-base
Thanks,
[cid:][cid:]
Yair Mizrahi Sr Lab IT engineer Office: + 972 722563243 Mobile: + 972 54 2327687 Email: Yair.Mizrahi@emc.commailto:Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com
EMC² - XtremIO Glil Yam 46905, Herzliya, Israel www.emc.comhttp://www.emc.com/
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something
Thanks a lot!!
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message -------- From: Noriko Hosoi nhosoi@redhat.com Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
Thank you for the update.
Regarding this symptom:
they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users
from 550). I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest.
Thanks, --noriko
On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
Hi Noriko,
This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5
I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD.
BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts.
Thanks,
*From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Noriko Hosoi *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 12:23 AM *To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1
Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)?
rpm -q 389-ds-base
Thanks,
cid:image001.gif@01CE0DED.C3CB64A0XtremIO
*Yair Mizrahi*
Sr Lab IT engineer
Office: + 972 722563243
Mobile: + 972 54 2327687
Email: Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com mailto:Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com
**
*EMC² - XtremIO *Glil Yam 46905,
Herzliya,
Israel www.emc.com http://www.emc.com/
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
I dumped the users to LDIF file but didn’t find anything special between the affected and unaffected users The only clue I found in the replication log is it doesn’t recognize the affected users as local (also says uid is -1) and then it deletes them.
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:35 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something Thanks a lot!!
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message -------- From: Noriko Hosoi nhosoi@redhat.commailto:nhosoi@redhat.com Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users Thank you for the update.
Regarding this symptom:
they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550).
I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest.
Thanks, --noriko
On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5
I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD. BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts.
Thanks,
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:23 AM To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1 Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)?
rpm -q 389-ds-base Thanks,
[cid:][cid:]
Yair Mizrahi Sr Lab IT engineer Office: + 972 722563243 Mobile: + 972 54 2327687 Email: Yair.Mizrahi@emc.commailto:Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com
EMC² - XtremIO Glil Yam 46905, Herzliya, Israel www.emc.comhttp://www.emc.com/
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orgmailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/22/2015 03:31 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
I dumped the users to LDIF file but didn’t find anything special between the affected and unaffected users
The only clue I found in the replication log is it doesn’t recognize the affected users as local (also says uid is -1) and then it deletes them.
Can we have the part of the log? Of course, you could replace the real name with something like "#####". Thanks!
*From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Noriko Hosoi *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 7:35 PM *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Subject:* Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something
Thanks a lot!!
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message -------- From: Noriko Hosoi nhosoi@redhat.com mailto:nhosoi@redhat.com Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
Thank you for the update.
Regarding this symptom:
they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users
from 550). I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest.
Thanks, --noriko
On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote:
Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5 I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD. BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts. Thanks, *From:*389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org> [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Noriko Hosoi *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 12:23 AM *To:* 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1 Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)? rpm -q 389-ds-base Thanks, cid:image001.gif@01CE0DED.C3CB64A0XtremIO *Yair Mizrahi* Sr Lab IT engineer Office: + 972 722563243 Mobile: + 972 54 2327687 Email: Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com <mailto:Yair.Mizrahi@emc.com> ** *EMC² - XtremIO *Glil Yam 46905, Herzliya, Israel www.emc.com <http://www.emc.com/> -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org