Hi Mark,

That is exactly what it is.  Just wanted to make sure that when I make one the "master" and deprecate the other one we can monitor to it for a while with performance, with intent to eventually shutdown the 9. Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whitney@mac.com

On Feb 15, 2017, at 09:41 AM, Mark Reynolds mareynol@redhat.com wrote:

On 02/15/2017 09:27 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi everyone,

I am currently testing RHDS 10 and have successfully initialized/replicated from RHDS 9 to RHDS 10.  Can I do the reverse?  Replicate from RHDS 10 to RHDS 9? You can - the protocol is the same, but I hope this is just a migration strategy.  You would really want to get all your servers on the same version asap.  DS 10 has many more replication fixes than DS 9, and potentially you could run into replication issues with this mixed deployment. Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whitney@mac.com

_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org

_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org