Gordon Messmer wrote:

Richard Megginson wrote:

...

Jo De Troy wrote:

...

Hello,

I was wondering when a next official release will be available.

We don't really know yet. We were hoping to have a beta of version 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks. This would be the new packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn't have the admin server, console, etc.

Will there be a 1.0.3?

We hadn't planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?

I like the packaging well enough as it is, and would like to see an official release with the SASL encryption fix that was just checked into CVS.

-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Richard Megginson wrote:

Gordon Messmer wrote:

...

Will there be a 1.0.3?

We hadn't planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?

Can't speak for the level of demand, but I'd like to see a 1.0.x version that didn't break when using GSSAPI. Maybe that's just because I don't know what else is changing for 1.1.

I'm running 1.0.2 on RHEL 4.

...

We hadn't planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?

I still have a lot of sites running FC3, simply because it's the last release with PHP 4 and PHP 5 breaks the PEAR LDAP module. If you are going to support RHEL 4 then you may as well support FC3.

OTOH most of my FC4 sites have moved up to FC5.