Unfortunately there is a bug (iPlanet/SUN Directory Server used to have the same bug, but it was fixed recently). In case you perform vlv searches and modifications occur at the same time the server hangs. Have a look at the release notes (http://docs.sun.com/source/819-1814-10/relnotes_ds51sp4.html) bug-id 4973380. Therefore, I do not want to accept any vlv requests.
Cheers -Reinhard
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mike Jackson Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:10 AM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Disabling vlv support
Richard Megginson wrote:
Views and VLV (Virtual List Views) are different. Views allows you to
impose a hierarchical DIT upon a flat tree (virtually). VLV is paged search results.
Right.
So, do you Rich have any tips how to disable VLV?
Although I still don't see the reason why somebody would want to do this. Are there misbehaving clients on your network, or what?
-- mike
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Unfortunately there is a bug (iPlanet/SUN Directory Server used to have the same bug, but it was fixed recently). In case you perform vlv searches and modifications occur at the same time the server hangs. Have a look at the release notes (http://docs.sun.com/source/819-1814-10/relnotes_ds51sp4.html) bug-id 4973380. Therefore, I do not want to accept any vlv requests.
This must be related to _indexed_ vlv requests concurrent with updates. I don't believe that a non-indexed vlv request can deadlock an update.
Anyway, why don't you file the bug against FDS and get it fixed ???? (If you're sure that the bug is present in FDS then presumably you have a reproduction case that can be pased into the bug report).
Is there a public Sun bugzilla where we can look at their bug report ? (I believe the answer to that is no, but perhaps I'm not looking hard enough...)
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org