Hello, I've compiled,installed,run,configured FDS with no pb so far, for a simple applicative schema, on Linux. I wish to do same things on Windows 2003, then to begin with, to compile. I've tried with MKS (see 1 below) but some pbs, I've tried with cygwin (see 2 below) but some pbs as well... I wonder what is the best strategy: going on with MKS, going on with cygwin, What must I check to succeed in compiling FDS on windows ?
Or can I find "somewhere" a binary version for windows....
Thank you very much in advance Paul Barnes
1) MKS (gmake), but quite quickly, make fails the following way ****************************************************************************
make
[ : ] make: execvp: true: Invalid argument make: *** [pre-everything] Error 127
2) I've tried on cygwin, I do face an other pb : ****************************************************** cd md; make export make[5]: Entering directory `/home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-fds102/ds/mozilla/wor k/mozilla/nsprpub/OPT.OBJ/pr/include/md' sh ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper nsinstall -m 444 ../../../../pr/include/md/_ aix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix64.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_dgux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.cfg ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_hpux32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_hpux64.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_irix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix64.cfg ../../../../pr/i nclude/md/_linux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_nec.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_next step.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_nto.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openvms.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_reliantunix.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.cfg ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_scoos.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.cfg ../../../../p r/include/md/_sony.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.cfg ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_unixware.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware7.cfg ../../../../pr/inc lude/md/_win16.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_win95.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_winnt.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.h ../../../. ./pr/include/md/_dgux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_hpux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_linu x.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_macos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.h ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_nec.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nextstep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_nspr_pthread.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nto.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_op envms.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2_errors.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_pcos.h ../../../.. /pr/include/md/_pth.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.h ../../../../pr/include/md /_reliantunix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.h ../../../../pr/include/md/ _scoos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sony.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unix_errors.h ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_unixos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware.h ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_win16.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_win32_errors.h ../../../../ pr/include/md/_win95.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_winnt.h ../../../../pr/include /md/prosdep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/sunos4.h /home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-f ds102/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/OPT.OBJ/include/md ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper: line 75: exec: nsinstall: not found make[5]: *** [export] Error 127
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
paul barnes wrote:
Hello, I've compiled,installed,run,configured FDS with no pb so far, for a simple applicative schema, on Linux. I wish to do same things on Windows 2003, then to begin with, to compile. I've tried with MKS (see 1 below) but some pbs, I've tried with cygwin (see 2 below) but some pbs as well... I wonder what is the best strategy: going on with MKS, going on with cygwin, What must I check to succeed in compiling FDS on windows ?
Or can I find "somewhere" a binary version for windows....
Thank you very much in advance Paul Barnes
- MKS (gmake), but quite quickly, make fails the following way
make
[ : ] make: execvp: true: Invalid argument make: *** [pre-everything] Error 127
- I've tried on cygwin, I do face an other pb :
cd md; make export make[5]: Entering directory `/home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-fds102/ds/mozilla/wor k/mozilla/nsprpub/OPT.OBJ/pr/include/md' sh ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper nsinstall -m 444 ../../../../pr/include/md/_ aix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix64.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_dgux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.cfg ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_hpux32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_hpux64.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_irix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix64.cfg ../../../../pr/i nclude/md/_linux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_nec.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_next step.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_nto.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openvms.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_reliantunix.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.cfg ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_scoos.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.cfg ../../../../p r/include/md/_sony.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.cfg ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_unixware.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware7.cfg ../../../../pr/inc lude/md/_win16.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_win95.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_winnt.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.h ../../../. ./pr/include/md/_dgux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_hpux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_linu x.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_macos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.h ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_nec.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nextstep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_nspr_pthread.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nto.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_op envms.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2_errors.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_pcos.h ../../../.. /pr/include/md/_pth.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.h ../../../../pr/include/md /_reliantunix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.h ../../../../pr/include/md/ _scoos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sony.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unix_errors.h ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_unixos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware.h ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_win16.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_win32_errors.h ../../../../ pr/include/md/_win95.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_winnt.h ../../../../pr/include /md/prosdep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/sunos4.h /home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-f ds102/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/OPT.OBJ/include/md ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper: line 75: exec: nsinstall: not found make[5]: *** [export] Error 127
A couple of thoughts:
1. You almost certainly need to use GNU make 2. Starting with dsbuild is probably not the best way to do this 3. While there is Apache for win32 the FDS modules haven't been tested at all under Windows and I suspect won't even compile.
Historically what we've done internally is to prebuild the components (NSPR, NSS, SASL, SNMP, etc) and put that into a "components" area so we don't have to build the entire world all the time. That is probably a better starting point. The trick is to get the binaries put into the proper directory structure. I believe there is an argument you need to pass to gmake for it to use "internal" components. The file components.mk would be a good place to start.
I'd use the Building page on the FDS wiki as a starting point for building. IIRC we used the MKS tools (except for make).
How you can get past the missing admin server I don't know. FDS doesn't really need an admin server to run. You may even be able to use one admin server to manage multiple FDS servers but I'm a little fuzzy on that.
rob
Thank you for your reply. As a precision I use gnake, I use MKS, I read the Building page on Windows http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#Windows.
I do not understand your reply as I might miss some information. What is the relation between the FDS modules and the fact there is Apache for Win 32 ? Are the FDS modules only used in the admin server ? What is then the list of components I can remove from the compilation list if I don't want the admin server to be compiled ? Or what is the list of components I do have to compile to get the FDS server only ?
Thank you in advance
Paul Barnes
Rob Crittenden rcritten@redhat.com a écrit : paul barnes wrote:
Hello, I've compiled,installed,run,configured FDS with no pb so far, for a simple applicative schema, on Linux. I wish to do same things on Windows 2003, then to begin with, to compile. I've tried with MKS (see 1 below) but some pbs, I've tried with cygwin (see 2 below) but some pbs as well... I wonder what is the best strategy: going on with MKS, going on with cygwin, What must I check to succeed in compiling FDS on windows ?
Or can I find "somewhere" a binary version for windows....
Thank you very much in advance Paul Barnes
- MKS (gmake), but quite quickly, make fails the following way
make
[ : ] make: execvp: true: Invalid argument make: *** [pre-everything] Error 127
- I've tried on cygwin, I do face an other pb :
cd md; make export make[5]: Entering directory `/home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-fds102/ds/mozilla/wor k/mozilla/nsprpub/OPT.OBJ/pr/include/md' sh ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper nsinstall -m 444 ../../../../pr/include/md/_ aix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix64.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_dgux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.cfg ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_hpux32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_hpux64.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_irix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix64.cfg ../../../../pr/i nclude/md/_linux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_nec.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_next step.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_nto.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openvms.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_reliantunix.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.cfg ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_scoos.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.cfg ../../../../p r/include/md/_sony.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.cfg ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_unixware.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware7.cfg ../../../../pr/inc lude/md/_win16.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_win95.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_winnt.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.h ../../../. ./pr/include/md/_dgux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_hpux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_linu x.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_macos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.h ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_nec.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nextstep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_nspr_pthread.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nto.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_op envms.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2_errors.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_pcos.h ../../../.. /pr/include/md/_pth.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.h ../../../../pr/include/md /_reliantunix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.h ../../../../pr/include/md/ _scoos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sony.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unix_errors.h ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_unixos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware.h ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_win16.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_win32_errors.h ../../../../ pr/include/md/_win95.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_winnt.h ../../../../pr/include /md/prosdep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/sunos4.h /home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-f ds102/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/OPT.OBJ/include/md ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper: line 75: exec: nsinstall: not found make[5]: *** [export] Error 127
A couple of thoughts:
1. You almost certainly need to use GNU make 2. Starting with dsbuild is probably not the best way to do this 3. While there is Apache for win32 the FDS modules haven't been tested at all under Windows and I suspect won't even compile.
Historically what we've done internally is to prebuild the components (NSPR, NSS, SASL, SNMP, etc) and put that into a "components" area so we don't have to build the entire world all the time. That is probably a better starting point. The trick is to get the binaries put into the proper directory structure. I believe there is an argument you need to pass to gmake for it to use "internal" components. The file components.mk would be a good place to start.
I'd use the Building page on the FDS wiki as a starting point for building. IIRC we used the MKS tools (except for make).
How you can get past the missing admin server I don't know. FDS doesn't really need an admin server to run. You may even be able to use one admin server to manage multiple FDS servers but I'm a little fuzzy on that.
rob -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
paul barnes wrote:
Thank you for your reply. As a precision I use gnake, I use MKS, I read the Building page on Windows http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#Windows.
I do not understand your reply as I might miss some information. What is the relation between the FDS modules and the fact there is Apache for Win 32 ? Are the FDS modules only used in the admin server ? What is then the list of components I can remove from the compilation list if I don't want the admin server to be compiled ? Or what is the list of components I do have to compile to get the FDS server only ?
FDS includes a java-based console to administer the server. This requires a web server to work and we currently use Apache. We wrote several Apache modules to make console work, notably: mod_nss, mod_admserv and mod_restartd. We have done zero testing with these on win32.
I didn't look but I doubt there is an option to not build the admin server. It would likely require some Makefile hacking (or probably a .mk file). The components used can be found in components.mk and/or components_versions.mk.
Looking at the building page it looks like adminserver/console requires:
console onlinehelp setuputil adminutil adminserver dsonlinehelp directoryconsole crimson dsmlgwjars mod_admserv mod_nss mod_restartd
Everything else looks like core FDS.
rob
Thank you in advance
Paul Barnes
Rob Crittenden rcritten@redhat.com a écrit : paul barnes wrote:
Hello, I've compiled,installed,run,configured FDS with no pb so far, for a simple applicative schema, on Linux. I wish to do same things on Windows 2003, then to begin with, to compile. I've tried with MKS (see 1 below) but some pbs, I've tried with cygwin (see 2 below) but some pbs as well... I wonder what is the best strategy: going on with MKS, going on with cygwin, What must I check to succeed in compiling FDS on windows ?
Or can I find "somewhere" a binary version for windows....
Thank you very much in advance Paul Barnes
- MKS (gmake), but quite quickly, make fails the following way
make
[ : ] make: execvp: true: Invalid argument make: *** [pre-everything] Error 127
- I've tried on cygwin, I do face an other pb :
cd md; make export make[5]: Entering directory `/home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-fds102/ds/mozilla/wor k/mozilla/nsprpub/OPT.OBJ/pr/include/md' sh ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper nsinstall -m 444 ../../../../pr/include/md/_ aix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix64.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_dgux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.cfg ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_hpux32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_hpux64.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_irix32.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix64.cfg ../../../../pr/i nclude/md/_linux.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_nec.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_next step.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_nto.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.c fg ../../../../pr/include/md/_openvms.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.cfg ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.cfg ../../../../ pr/include/md/_reliantunix.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.cfg ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_scoos.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.cfg ../../../../p r/include/md/_sony.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.cfg ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_unixware.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware7.cfg ../../../../pr/inc lude/md/_win16.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_win95.cfg ../../../../pr/include/m d/_winnt.cfg ../../../../pr/include/md/_aix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_beos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_bsdi.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_darwin.h ../../../. ./pr/include/md/_dgux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_freebsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_hpux.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_irix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_linu x.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_macos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_ncr.h ../../.. /../pr/include/md/_nec.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_netbsd.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nextstep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_nspr_pthread.h ../../../../pr/incl ude/md/_nto.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_openbsd.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_op envms.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_os2_errors.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_osf1.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_pcos.h ../../../.. /pr/include/md/_pth.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_qnx.h ../../../../pr/include/md /_reliantunix.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_rhapsody.h ../../../../pr/include/md/ _scoos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_solaris.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sony.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_sunos4.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unix_errors.h ../ ../../../pr/include/md/_unixos.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_unixware.h ../../../ ../pr/include/md/_win16.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_win32_errors.h ../../../../ pr/include/md/_win95.h ../../../../pr/include/md/_winnt.h ../../../../pr/include /md/prosdep.h ../../../../pr/include/md/sunos4.h /home/desgranp/fedora/dsbuild-f ds102/ds/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/OPT.OBJ/include/md ../../../../build/cygwin-wrapper: line 75: exec: nsinstall: not found make[5]: *** [export] Error 127
A couple of thoughts:
- You almost certainly need to use GNU make
- Starting with dsbuild is probably not the best way to do this
- While there is Apache for win32 the FDS modules haven't been tested
at all under Windows and I suspect won't even compile.
Historically what we've done internally is to prebuild the components (NSPR, NSS, SASL, SNMP, etc) and put that into a "components" area so we don't have to build the entire world all the time. That is probably a better starting point. The trick is to get the binaries put into the proper directory structure. I believe there is an argument you need to pass to gmake for it to use "internal" components. The file components.mk would be a good place to start.
I'd use the Building page on the FDS wiki as a starting point for building. IIRC we used the MKS tools (except for make).
How you can get past the missing admin server I don't know. FDS doesn't really need an admin server to run. You may even be able to use one admin server to manage multiple FDS servers but I'm a little fuzzy on that.
rob
Paul, while the paragraph here http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#Windows implies that FDS builds on Windows. In fact it doesn't. It _could_ be made to build, install and run on Windows, since there was a Windows version of its ancestor products. But I'd be astonished if someone could get it to build and install with less than a month's solid work. It might take three months. This isn't something that you'll be able to do with answers to one or two simple questions on this list. (unfortunately). You'll need to study and understand the build process, and also write quite a bit of code in order to complete the project.
Removing the admin server from the build will help (although I guess one might question the usefulness of the result), but it isn't by any means all that needs to be done.
Thank you for your reply
I'm quite used of Netscape DS&Sun DS, and would have appreciated FDS specially for its plugin capabilities, and its Windows support! But costs, as you present them, are prohibitive for me so far.
=> I'm looking for an applicative Directory Server on Windows...
There was, in my mind, OpenLDAP, ADAM, FDS, ... - OpenLDAP (now v2.3.34) is not officialy supported for Windows http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/196.html , even if we can find Windows version of OpenLDAP http://lucas.bergmans.us/hacks/openldap/ (only v2.2.29 so far)
- ADAM has some particularities which makes it not so easy to handle (for me), but must be investigated a little bit...
- FDS : the question is "Does Redhat intends to support FDS on Windows, and when?"
Does anybody have any other ideas or can give me indications ....
Thank you
Paul Barnes
David Boreham david_list@boreham.org a écrit : Paul, while the paragraph here http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#Windows implies that FDS builds on Windows. In fact it doesn't. It _could_ be made to build, install and run on Windows, since there was a Windows version of its ancestor products. But I'd be astonished if someone could get it to build and install with less than a month's solid work. It might take three months. This isn't something that you'll be able to do with answers to one or two simple questions on this list. (unfortunately). You'll need to study and understand the build process, and also write quite a bit of code in order to complete the project.
Removing the admin server from the build will help (although I guess one might question the usefulness of the result), but it isn't by any means all that needs to be done.
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
You might take a look at the ApacheDS project - http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/index.html They seem to be working on a 1.0 release; I've never used it, but am subscribed to their mailing list which is pretty active.
paul barnes wrote:
Thank you for your reply
I'm quite used of Netscape DS&Sun DS, and would have appreciated FDS specially for its plugin capabilities, and its Windows support! But costs, as you present them, are prohibitive for me so far.
=> I'm looking for an applicative Directory Server on Windows...
There was, in my mind, OpenLDAP, ADAM, FDS, ...
- OpenLDAP (now v2.3.34) is not officialy supported for Windows
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/196.html , even if we can find Windows version of OpenLDAP http://lucas.bergmans.us/hacks/openldap/ (only v2.2.29 so far)
- ADAM has some particularities which makes it not so easy to handle
(for me), but must be investigated a little bit...
- FDS : the question is "Does Redhat intends to support FDS on
Windows, and when?"
Does anybody have any other ideas or can give me indications ....
Thank you
Paul Barnes
*/David Boreham david_list@boreham.org/* a écrit :
Paul, while the paragraph here http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#Windows implies that FDS builds on Windows. In fact it doesn't. It _could_ be made to build, install and run on Windows, since there was a Windows version of its ancestor products. But I'd be astonished if someone could get it to build and install with less than a month's solid work. It might take three months. This isn't something that you'll be able to do with answers to one or two simple questions on this list. (unfortunately). You'll need to study and understand the build process, and also write quite a bit of code in order to complete the project. Removing the admin server from the build will help (although I guess one might question the usefulness of the result), but it isn't by any means all that needs to be done. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
paul barnes wrote:
Does anybody have any other ideas or can give me indications ....
Robert's suggestion of ApacheDS is a good one. It's used for the NT4 sync feature of FSD, principally because otherwise a Windows version of FDS would have been required, and because modifying its functionality with plugins is quite easy (Java and SWIG).
ApacheDS doesn't yet have the feature set that FDS has, but if you want a DS that runs on Windows and isn't from Microsoft, it could be an option for you.
BTW it looks like Sun still ships their DS for Windows.
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org