On 11/22/2011 10:37 AM, Mo Morsi wrote:
On 11/21/2011 05:02 PM, jvlcek(a)redhat.com wrote:
> From: Joe VLcek<jvlcek(a)redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe VLcek<jvlcek(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> aeolus-conductor.spec.in | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/aeolus-conductor.spec.in b/aeolus-conductor.spec.in
> index 6db6480..f27c498 100644
> --- a/aeolus-conductor.spec.in
> +++ b/aeolus-conductor.spec.in
> @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ Tests and other development tools for the Aeolus
> Conductor.
> %build
>
> %pre
> -getent group aeolus>/dev/null || /usr/sbin/groupadd -g 451 -r aeolus
> 2>/dev/null || :
> +getent group aeolus>/dev/null || /usr/sbin/groupadd -g 180 -r aeolus
> 2>/dev/null || :
> getent passwd aeolus>/dev/null || \
> - /usr/sbin/useradd -u 451 -g aeolus -c "aeolus" \
> + /usr/sbin/useradd -u 180 -g aeolus -c "aeolus" \
> -s /sbin/nologin -r -d /var/aeolus aeolus 2> /dev/null || :
>
> %install
ACK.
Note if you're doing this on a system which you have aeolus previous
installed, the user will remain as is due to the check.
-Mo
Thanks Mo
Yes I had noticed that. My plan is to send an email describing what needs
to be done.
Thank you,
Joe