On 11/29/2011 11:37 PM, Matt Wagner wrote:
In reviewing Scott's patch, I included a nit talking about how
the flash messages (for both success and errors) were oddly-worded. Scott's patch
didn't actually introduce them, so I just fixed them.
It'd be great if someone who was an I18n master would look this over to make sure
I'm not doing anything too unorthodox. I think this patch should have two benefits:
1.) The messages sound more human, at least to me.
For what it's worth from a non-native speaker, they sound better to me
as well.
2.) We no longer concatenate strings outside of the data dictionary,
so they should be more I18n-friendly.
This is exactly what we should be doing everywhere. I think the
reviewers need to be more strict with what they allow i18n-wise. I've
been guilty of letting this go as well.
This patch was fixing a nit of mine and isn't an essential part of the sprint, so
don't go too out of your way.
-- Matt
ACK, thanks for doing this.
Thomas
--
No trees were killed to send this message, but a large number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced.