On 11/04/2011 03:41 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
> A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
> glibc: Both have arm patches, but are they the same patches?
I started looking at 2.14.7.arm0 (v5) vs 220.127.116.11.0.arm1 (v7) this
morning. It is not clear to me if glibc-2.14.7.arm0 does have arm
specific patches. 18.104.22.168.0.arm1 does have:
It looks like glibc-arm-tzdata.patch isn't needed in 2.14.7.
Correct, I hope that the patch for tzdata from
has been included.
Andreas closed the bug after the last comment, so I assume it was accepted.