El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:34:33 +0000
Gordan Bobic <gordan(a)bobich.net> escribió:
On 01/01/2012 02:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000
> Gordan Bobic<gordan(a)bobich.net> escribió:
>> On 01/01/2012 01:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:26:00 -0700
>>> <webwillow(a)thewebwillow.com> escribió:
>>>> As i have come across the builds of rpm's in koji i noticed that
>>>> some packages have something like dist_0.src.rpm or
>>>> dist_1.src.rpm instead if dist.src.rpm. This causes koji to spit
>>>> them out due to version mismatch errors, how is this addressed
>>>> by the fedora team? Do ou have to modify the main tag or?
>>>
>>> we make the srpms from a git checkout on primary arches. %{?dist}
>>> is set to whats expected inside the buildroot used to make the
>>> srpms. the srpms we feed into secondary arches have matching
>>> fedora-release installed and get the right values. without
>>> specifics about what your talking about or doing there is no way
>>> to help you.
>>
>> I believe what Don is talking about is that some src.rpm packages
>> are called dist_<number>.src.rpm instead of dist.<number>.src.rpm,
>> and what we have found is that koji seems to choke on this. But if
>> you:
>>
>> rpm -ivh mypackage-1.2.3.dist_1.src.rpm
>> cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
>> rpmbuild -bs mypackage.spec
>>
>> you end up with mypackage-1.2.3.dist.1.src.rpm
>>
>> If you feed the original file with the underscore to koji, it
>> chokes on it. If you feed it the newly generated src.rpm with
>> the . in the name instead of _, it works fine.
>>
>> What Don and I are wondering about is where did these _ named
>> packages come from and why.
>
> im guessing then your talking about rhel rpms. the dist value
> would be set to whats in the srpm at its build time.
Yes we are talking about the RHEL6 rpms, but the problem isn't in the
dist part - the problem seems to be that something has ended up
creating the src.rpms with the _ separator after the dist part for
some reason.
thats part of the dist tag
Dennis