Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
>> mmc/sdhci modules.
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS
> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827
> kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457
> kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL
>
> So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental cpufreq patch,
which is very dangerous.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/f30/f/bcm2835-cpufreq-add-...
Please try to remove this patch at first
That hasn't changed in some kernels, we've had that there for some
time, in F-29 too
> >
> > I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps.
> >
> > Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression?
> >
> > (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed
> > anything like that yet.)
> >
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
> > The vanilla kernels I have built with:
> >
https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch
> > As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now:
> > Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553
> > _______________________________________________
> > arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org