On 09/14/2016 01:00 PM, Ziqian SUN(zsun) wrote:
Sorry for reply on ancient mail.
I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want to know
what's the support status of Hikey Board?
And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board usually needs a
img. So if supported, any hints on how I can install it on my Hikey (or even, how can I
convert the ISO to a img file)?
Thanks.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/F24/Installation
Hi,
The dragonboard uses a different bootloader (little kernel) than was is expected for
Fedora aarch64 installation. There is a Fedora 23 remix that runs off of a sd card for
the dragonboard 410c:
https://dmarlin.fedorapeople.org/fedora-arm/aarch64/README.Linaro-F23-rem...
-Will
On 09/25/2015 09:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Clive Messer <clive.m.messer(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> Is F23 aarch64 supporting either HiKey or Dragonboard?
>
> HiKey should boot with 4.2 (what's in F-23) with MMC, usb looks
> terrible which isn't particularly useful, in theory wireless is
> upstream but I've not had a chance to get that far as I'm awaiting a
> decent UART [1] for easy debug of the board, at the moment I've not
> enabled dragonboard (QCOM) but it's on my list for next week, it's
> confirmed that HDMI has issues but everything else should work. The
> QCom stuff has weird bootloaders (not uboot or uEFI) so YMMV.
>
> [1]
http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/96Boards-UART-p-2525.html?ref=newInBazaar
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
>