On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:41 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
> A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
> glibc: Both have arm patches, but are they the same patches?
I started looking at 2.14.7.arm0 (v5) vs 188.8.131.52.0.arm1 (v7) this
morning. It is not clear to me if glibc-2.14.7.arm0 does have arm
specific patches. 184.108.40.206.0.arm1 does have:
I have been running an armv7hl glibc 2.14-7 for the last few days
and haven't found any problems with it. It is the same as the
2.14-7.arm0 package with the addition of the arm-clone-unwind.patch
and the patch for http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10103
I put the src rpm at http://msalter.fedorapeople.org/arm/
If someone could build this and try it out on armv5tel and it doesn't
break anything, then I think we can start using it for both builds.