8:34 p.m.
Don't worry you're not seeing things... We're keeping numbers in sync
with mainline and they went from RC2 -> RC4 in quick stead and decided
RC5 was needed. This should be close to mainline RC5 with all the same
package fixes pulled into the compose.
Please test!!
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/compose/21_RC5/
9:38 p.m.
On 12/03/2014 09:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Don't worry you're not seeing things... We're keeping
numbers in sync
with mainline and they went from RC2 -> RC4 in quick stead and decided
RC5 was needed. This should be close to mainline RC5 with all the same
package fixes pulled into the compose.
Please test!!
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/compose/21_RC5/
From the test-announce, I don't see how bug 1166598 applies to the arm
builds.
But since I don't own an arm64 board, maybe they are installed
differently and so this partitioning bug applies?
I am still trying to get the RC4 testing done. :(
4:45 a.m.
> Don't worry you're not seeing things... We're keeping
numbers in sync
> with mainline and they went from RC2 -> RC4 in quick stead and decided
> RC5 was needed. This should be close to mainline RC5 with all the same
> package fixes pulled into the compose.
>
> Please test!!
>
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/compose/21_RC5/
From the test-announce, I don't see how bug 1166598 applies to the arm
builds.
But since I don't own an arm64 board, maybe they are installed differently
and so this partitioning bug applies?
It's a generic issue with live image install. We don't currently
produce such things but it doesn't mean people don't want to.
Ultimately for secondary architectures we try and stay as close as
possible to mainline so if the fix is relevant it improves the
release, if not there's no impact.
Peter
4:30 a.m.
W dniu 04.12.2014 o 03:34, Peter Robinson pisze:
Don't worry you're not seeing things... We're keeping
numbers in sync
with mainline and they went from RC2 -> RC4 in quick stead and decided
RC5 was needed. This should be close to mainline RC5 with all the same
package fixes pulled into the compose.
Please test!!
Shell> fs0:\EFI\BOOT\BOOTAA64.EFI
Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found
Failed to load image \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi: Not Found
Loading fs0:\EFI\BOOT\grubaa64.efi works.
Having MokManager.efi is nice. Check [1] for info how to use own keys
for signing kernel modules.
1. http://gorka.eguileor.com/category/technology/linux
I noticed that there is no 'this is testing' nagging requester. Also
nice side/top graphics with "fedora SERVER" information.
Installed without issues. Then made another installation with custom
partitioning to check how resizing of LVM volumes work. Result:
[root@localhost ~]# lsblk /dev/sda
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 234M 0 part /boot/efi
├─sda2 8:2 0 4G 0 part
├─sda3 8:3 0 500M 0 part
└─sda4 8:4 0 461G 0 part
├─fedora--server-root00 253:0 0 46.6G 0 lvm /
├─fedora--server-swap 253:1 0 8G 0 lvm
├─fedora--server-home 253:6 0 103G 0 lvm /home
└─fedora--server-root 253:7 0 50G 0 lvm
Two F21 root partitions on one machine.
3425
days inactive
3425
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Marcin Juszkiewicz -
Peter Robinson -
Robert Moskowitz