Thank you for the great work on an unofficially supported platform -yet.
Before filling a bug, I was wondering if you were aware of this issue/workaround. A quick search on BZ yield nothing... Luckily, SSH access wireless or not still possible. FWIW, a few weeks ago, I was able to blindly switch to a virtual console, login and initiate reboot/shutdown, but that doesn't seem to do the trick anymore.
Regards,
BM
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Benjamin M wrote:
Thank you for the great work on an unofficially supported platform -yet.
Before filling a bug, I was wondering if you were aware of this issue/workaround. A quick search on BZ yield nothing... Luckily, SSH access wireless or not still possible. FWIW, a few weeks ago, I was able to blindly switch to a virtual console, login and initiate reboot/shutdown, but that doesn't seem to do the trick anymore.
I have the same problem on Pinebook (not the pro). I'm not sure what module is the problem.
It used to work on f32. Similar problems on older Intel laptops since upgrading to f34 as well, so maybe something about systemd or Xorg server (not the drivers)?
Thank you for the great work on an unofficially supported platform -yet.
Before filling a bug, I was wondering if you were aware of this issue/workaround.
Please ensure all bugs are linked against the ARMTracker as a blocker bug.
A quick search on BZ yield nothing... Luckily, SSH access wireless or not still possible. FWIW, a few weeks ago, I was able to blindly switch to a virtual console, login and initiate reboot/shutdown, but that doesn't seem to do the trick anymore.
I have the same problem on Pinebook (not the pro). I'm not sure what module is the problem.
It used to work on f32. Similar problems on older Intel laptops since upgrading to f34 as well, so maybe something about systemd or Xorg server (not the drivers)?
It's extremely unlikely to be the same problem. These problems tend to be HW/driver specific and and even be affected by the model of screen and the quirks of it's EDID and other such things.
Without the hardware in front of someone the bug reports need to be extremely accurate with lots of details, things like "It used to work on f32" are like trying to hunt for needles in a haystack.
The work I do is extremely limited to my personal time these days and I tend to focus that limited time on feature enablement, like making the Pinebook Pro work. I try to dig into regressions where ever possible but they need to have a reasonable amount of information so that I can begin to even know where to start. The bare minimum would be to the likes of "it worked with 5.21.4 but stopped with 5.12.5" or "worked with mesa 21.0 and not with 21.0.3", exact make/models of screens etc. Elsewhere with the little time that the few of us that do HW enablement have to deal with these things are better spent on enhancements.
Sorry for being a little blunt here but mostly trying to set expectations. There's very few people that actively work on the cheap Arm HW enablement in Fedora and those that do primarily do it in our spare time. When we do we do it upstream so the entire ecosystem can benefit. So unfortunately unless it's HW we can actively reproduce with, and while I have RPi HW I don't actively test graphics because the fully accelerated graphics stack isn't upstream (#1 reason why it's not officially supported in Fedora) and I have 2 screens which don't seem to exhibit the issue.
Peter
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Peter Robinson wrote:
I have the same problem on Pinebook (not the pro). I'm not sure what module is the problem.
It used to work on f32. Similar problems on older Intel laptops since upgrading to f34 as well, so maybe something about systemd or Xorg server (not the drivers)?
It's extremely unlikely to be the same problem. These problems tend to be HW/driver specific and and even be affected by the model of screen and the quirks of it's EDID and other such things.
You are right. On the Intel laptops, killing Xorg (from a remote login) resolves the problem. On Pinebook, Xorg restarts, but the screen is still black. So clearly they are different problems.
I have the same problem on Pinebook (not the pro). I'm not sure what module is the problem.
It used to work on f32. Similar problems on older Intel laptops since upgrading to f34 as well, so maybe something about systemd or Xorg server (not the drivers)?
It's extremely unlikely to be the same problem. These problems tend to be HW/driver specific and and even be affected by the model of screen and the quirks of it's EDID and other such things.
You are right. On the Intel laptops, killing Xorg (from a remote login) resolves the problem. On Pinebook, Xorg restarts, but the screen is still black. So clearly they are different problems.
I would have thought on the Penbook (traditional or Pro) they would be using Wayland so I would be surprised if there was a Xorg process even running.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Peter Robinson wrote:
You are right. On the Intel laptops, killing Xorg (from a remote login) resolves the problem. On Pinebook, Xorg restarts, but the screen is still black. So clearly they are different problems.
I would have thought on the Penbook (traditional or Pro) they would be using Wayland so I would be surprised if there was a Xorg process even running.
I am running LXDE, because Pinebook has only 2G - not expandable. Does one of the other lightweight desktops use Wayland in f34? That would be worth trying.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Peter Robinson wrote:
You are right. On the Intel laptops, killing Xorg (from a remote login) resolves the problem. On Pinebook, Xorg restarts, but the screen is still black. So clearly they are different problems.
I would have thought on the Penbook (traditional or Pro) they would be using Wayland so I would be surprised if there was a Xorg process even running.
I am running LXDE, because Pinebook has only 2G - not expandable. Does one of the other lightweight desktops use Wayland in f34? That would be worth trying.
I had this (or something similar) after updating my Pi4 to F34 in April. In my case it was to do with the screen saver which I think I fixed by removing the xscreensaver package, tidying up any related files in /etc/xdg/autostart/ and reinstalling the xfce4-screensaver package. I may have also checked the screenserver settings were reasonable.
Michael Young