5:34 a.m.
Hi,
So I found this page searching for some stack which has Java running on
linux running on a ARM11 processor(Samsung s3c6410) to be exact. I am linux
NOOB too. From what I read I understand that I have to build the kernel
again for my target board. Is this also true for each of the binaries on the
rootfs or from the yum repository?
thx-
Satya.
5:37 a.m.
On 01/26/10 11:34, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi,
So I found this page searching for some stack which has Java running on
linux running on a ARM11 processor(Samsung s3c6410) to be exact. I am
linux NOOB too. From what I read I understand that I have to build the
kernel again for my target board. Is this also true for each of the
binaries on the rootfs or from the yum repository?
No, you just need to take care of your bootloader and your kernel
specific to the board.
The rest of Fedora you can use the generic prebuilt binary packages and
the rootfs tarball to get started.
If you hold your rootfs on SD Card, things are very nice and easy the
Fedora way.
BTW I used SD Card boot with s3c6410 myself. You can get the bootloader
fetched from SD Card too direct from ROM, it is extremely convenient.
-Andy
6:14 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Satyaprakash Buddhavarapu
<satyaprakash007(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So I found this page searching for some stack which has Java running
on
linux running on a ARM11 processor(Samsung s3c6410) to be exact. I am linux
NOOB too. From what I read I understand that I have to build the kernel
again for my target board. Is this also true for each of the binaries on the
rootfs or from the yum repository?
Did the ml change address?
fedora-arm.redhat.com vs arm.lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Felipe Contreras
6:20 a.m.
Felipe Contreras píše v Út 26. 01. 2010 v 14:14 +0200:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Satyaprakash Buddhavarapu
<satyaprakash007(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> So I found this page searching for some stack which has Java running on
> linux running on a ARM11 processor(Samsung s3c6410) to be exact. I am linux
> NOOB too. From what I read I understand that I have to build the kernel
> again for my target board. Is this also true for each of the binaries on the
> rootfs or from the yum repository?
Did the ml change address?
fedora-arm.redhat.com vs arm.lists.fedoraproject.org
yes, it did, Fedora mailing were migrated from Red Hat to Fedora
infrastructure 2 weeks ago
Dan
6:24 a.m.
Did the ml change address?
fedora-arm.redhat.com vs arm.lists.fedoraproject.org
Yep. As a part of this
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-December/msg000...
Jitesh
--
Felipe Contreras
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
6:26 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jitesh Shah <jiteshs(a)marvell.com> wrote:
>Did the ml change address?
>fedora-arm.redhat.com vs arm.lists.fedoraproject.org
Yep. As a part of this
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-December/msg000...
I like that :)
Thanks for the clarification.
--
Felipe Contreras
5198
days inactive
5198
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andy Green -
Dan Horák -
Felipe Contreras -
Jitesh Shah -
Satyaprakash Buddhavarapu