On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 08:52 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
----- "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 04:22 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have tried to create another piece of documentation,
> > that could help new test developers testing their
> > new tests :)
> >
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Verifying_AutoQA_tests
> >
> > Feel free to improve.
> > Kamil
>
> Great write-up! I wonder if we should focus on verifying using only
> autotest-client, and only mention autotest-server as an exceptional
> case
> (or not at all)? Anything that requires someone to follow the
> autotest
> setup instructions [1] to validate their test will most certainly
> scare them off.
>
> I've made a minor wording change to address this. Hopefully this
> doesn't change the initial intent for your document.
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Verifying_AutoQA_tests#Prerequisites
>
Thank you, I agree, we will consider local testing as default and
link to autotest-server stuff as more advanced usage.
Just be merciful with the wordplay, for us non-english it sometimes
takes non-trivial brain power to puzzle it out :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_Fuse,_Get_Away
Heh, great point. I'm notorious for phrases that don't translate
well :( Couldn't think of anything universal at the time, I'll change
that once something more clear comes to mind.
Thanks,
James