Oh, oh, still learning. I didn't separate the headers from body text by one empty line, so first half of my message is missing. Recreating that part from memory:

Hello, this patch implies --keep-control-file when --dry-run is used. The --dry-run itself is great, but you usually see in the output only lines like these:

(continue reading quoted part)

----- "Kamil Páral" kparal@redhat.com wrote:

/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/autotest --verbose -t post-repo-update:repoclosure.x86_64 /tmp/autoqa-control.O1kKrU

To really inspect what will be run (which is the reason why you run dry) you still need to inspect the control file. Therefore I think the --dry-run should quite conveniently also imply the --keep-control-file (which is a little long option to have to type it everytime).

What do you think, should I commit it or not? _______________________________________________ autoqa-devel mailing list autoqa-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel