September 2015 - cloud - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[cloud] #40: rel-eng/image upload changes for f21

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#40: rel-eng/image upload changes for f21 -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Infrastructure & Release | (Alpha) Engineering | Keywords: -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Some small updates to the cloud image upload process: * https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5880 * https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5881 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/40> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[cloud] #70: cloud-init output not going to the openstack log

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#70: cloud-init output not going to the openstack log ---------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Beta) Component: --- | Keywords: ---------------------+------------------------------ Some combination of "got something wrong in the kernel parameters or where cloud-init is sending its output". -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/70> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[cloud] #43: procedures and process for getting updated images onto mirrors

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#43: procedures and process for getting updated images onto mirrors ------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Beta) Component: Software Updates | Keywords: ------------------------------+------------------------------ Right now, cloud images only get mirrored at GA release time. We need to figure out how to ship updates. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/43> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 6 months

1
6
0 / 0

[cloud] #125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes ----------------------+-------------------- Reporter: scollier | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: ----------------------+-------------------- Would be nice to have a couple of services put together to create an application that is managed by Kubernetes on Atomic. This would need to be clearly documented. We would need the proper json kubernetes files to launch the apps with. A few examples would be nice: 1. simple web server with a database 2. simple web server 3. others? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/125> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 7 months

2
13
0 / 0

[cloud] #115: Fedora Cloud FAD (late 2015/early 2016)

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#115: Fedora Cloud FAD (late 2015/early 2016) -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: dustymabe Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Planning | Keywords: meeting -----------------------+----------------------- At Flock we talked about having a Fedora Activity Day for the cloud working group to get some work done. This ticket will serve as a stub for planning and coordination of this event. The first step is to write up a proposal and submit it for review. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/115> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 10 months

1
9
0 / 0

[cloud] #93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images --------------------------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: kushal | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Keywords: meeting --------------------------------------------------+----------------------- This will help things systemd to search the images provided by Fedora in a standard way using nspawn tool. Example of such file from ubuntu: https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/SHA1SUMS https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/SHA256SUMS.gpg -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 10 months

1
15
0 / 0

dnf in Dockerfiles

by Joe Brockmeier

Hey all, So dgilmore pointed out that f22 docker images will not have yum installed - which means we need to update the Dockerfiles for f22 to use dnf and not yum. We probably ought to go through and sanity-check them all to ensure they work with the f22 image as well before, say, beta. I'm CC'ing Scott b/c, if I'm not mistaken, he's done quite a lot of the work so far on the Dockerfiles - but also, I think he's looking for assistance there in keeping the effort going. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

7 years, 11 months

10
12
0 / 0

[cloud] #123: Document process for using Fedora-Dockerfile branches

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#123: Document process for using Fedora-Dockerfile branches ----------------------+-------------------- Reporter: scollier | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: ----------------------+-------------------- This should probably go on the github repo home page. Need to provide instructions for users to submit to a specific branch, and not just to master. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/123> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

8 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

[cloud] #88: Social Media for Dockerfiles

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#88: Social Media for Dockerfiles -----------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: jzb | Owner: jzb Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Docker Base Container | Keywords: meeting -----------------------------------+--------------------- We need to work with marketing to tweet about things regularly. I'd like to put out regular tweets to promote individual Dockerfiles. Thoughts? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/88> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

8 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

[cloud] #99: AMI lifetimes (Cloud WG members vote needed)

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#99: AMI lifetimes (Cloud WG members vote needed) -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: oddshocks | Owner: oddshocks Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Infrastructure & | Keywords: aws, images, vote, Release Engineering | policy -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- This ticket is to discuss and vote on appropriate lifetimes for Fedora Cloud AMIs on our official and community cloud accounts, as discussed on the Cloud SIG list this month[1] and in this week's meeting. Everyone seems to agree that after a final release, all TC, RC, Alpha, Beta, and scratch builds should be deleted. This makes sense because there'd be no reason to use any of these AMIs after the final release. Still, we need to definitively decide on: 1. When should TC, RC, Alpha, Beta, and scratch builds be deleted? (1) After a final release? (2) Progressively, when a newer build of the same type comes out? (3) After a set amount of time, depending on the build type? Note that with (2) or (3), we'd need some way to mark each build with it's type. I don't think that necessarily happens now. 2. When should final release AMIs be deleted? (1) After a certain number of newer final releases? (2) After a certain amount of time? (3) Never? Also note that if we choose any age-based deletion policies, we'd need to set up some sort of regular polling of *all* our AMIs on both accounts. We want to hold as few AMIs at one time as is reasonable. There are many AMIs created for each image build that happens, so our AWS storage charges will become quite high if we don't keep our accounts clean. Discuss, and then perhaps a vote? [1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2015-March/005087.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/99> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

8 years, 2 months

1
18
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud September 2015