July 2016 - cloud - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Fedora 24 Atomic: Issue with /etc/os-release VARIANT_ID not being updated on Fedora 23 upgrade.

by Charlie Drage

*Issue:* VARIANT_ID isn't updated within /etc/os-release from this commit: https://pagure.io/fork/sgallagh/fedora-release/c/56267336c738f80e3e7a344c... to Fedora 24 Atomic host. This is needed in order to differentiate Fedora 24 Atomic hosts from their other versions (Server + Cloud). With the help from Stephen Gallagher, it was found that the updated package set for fedora-release-atomic is missing when generating Fedora 24 Atomic. *To replicate: * See: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/390347/ + cat /etc/os-release after upgrade (the commit above should of added VARIANT_ID="atomic.host" to /etc/os-release *Resolution:* In order to get this resolved, the missing package set (fedora-release-atomic) should be added :) Many thanks! Charlie Drage PGP - 4096R/C037D617 http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA227403C037D617

7 years, 7 months

3
4
0 / 0

[cloud] #151: Need owner to define basic container smoke testing requirements

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#151: Need owner to define basic container smoke testing requirements ---------------------+--------------------- Reporter: acarter | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: meeting ---------------------+--------------------- The release tooling team will begin shipping layered images officially in F25. As part of that, we'll be creating an automated release workflow that includes testing via Taskotron. In order to scope Taskotron requirements, we need to know the core testing requirements are for basic smoke testing that will be shared across containers. We need an owner to define those tests initially. I'd also like to know whether that person would continue to own them going forward or if ownership would fall to the group or another individual at that time. This should be done soon so that we can scope Taskotron work. Note: Kushal has noted that the owner should be sure to discuss with the internal Container Certification team -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/151> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 8 months

1
9
0 / 0

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

by noreply＠fedoraproject.org

A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be downloaded at: Images can be found here: https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/CloudImages/x86_64/im... https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fed... Thank you, Fedora Release Engineering

7 years, 8 months

5
4
0 / 0

Today's minutes

by Josh Berkus

================================== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg ================================== Meeting started by jberkus at 17:03:13 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-27/fedora_clou... . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (jberkus, 17:03:30) * action items (jberkus, 17:06:30) * announcement (jberkus, 17:07:41) * action items (jberkus, 17:09:38) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/report/9 (jberkus, 17:09:48) * FAO (jberkus, 17:20:06) * flock (jberkus, 17:27:46) * LINK: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.or... (scollier, 17:35:20) * LINK: https://flock2016.sched.org/event/7mOO/prd-workshop (scollier, 17:35:39) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_PRD (nirik, 17:41:47) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Lbrabec (jzb, 17:43:48) * open floor (jberkus, 17:46:23) Meeting ended at 17:51:06 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * jberkus (73) * maxamillion (47) * jzb (34) * zodbot (17) * scollier (15) * kushal (14) * dustymabe (11) * jbrooks (8) * bowlofeggs (6) * nirik (3) * trishnag (3) * nzwulfin (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpm-ostree history was lost

by Dusty Mabe

So when we pointed the thing that makes new ostrees to the "correct" location we started a new ostree repo that knows nothing about the old ostree history. I just did an upgrade and here is what I'm looking at: [vagrant@vanilla-f24atomic ~]$ sudo rpm-ostree status TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC 2016-07-24 20:14:21 24.4 c4b2c5e08d fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host so what I was on was 24.39 and the upgrade went to 24.4. are we ok with this? I think the solution would be to delete the ostree at the new (correct) location and cp the contents of the old ostree into place and go from there. The alternative is to just leave it and eventually the version # will be greater than 39 again. Dusty

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Request for PRD changes proposals

by Jan Kurik

Hi, I would like to request proposals from the Cloud Working Group to amend PRD [1] to reflect the latest state of the Fedora Cloud Product. These proposals will be discussed on Flock 2016 in Krakow and finally reviewed by Fedora Council [2]. Details of the PRD workshop on Flock will be shared once we will have a meeting room reservation confirmed. For more details you can check the PRD review ticket from the last year [3] and schedule for this annual review [4]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_PRD [2] https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/63 [3] https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/36 [4] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-25/f-25-council.html Thanks and Best Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

7 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup

by Dusty Mabe

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2016-07-27 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

by Jason DeTiberus

On Jul 20, 2016 5:30 PM, "Adam Miller" <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin(a)rm-rf.ca> wrote: > > A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue. > > > > We're also quite well set up to deploy, manage, and upgrade containerized OpenShift deployments. (however this all uses docker today) This is only tested on RHEL and RHEL Atomic today (AFAIK) but the mechanism for doing it should already cover CentOS and Fedora Atomic variants and I suspect this would be extremely easy to get working, if it didn't just work out of the box today. > > > > We have not started down the system containers path in openshift-ansible but we very much are looking forward to that, so the work would be relevant and if the Fedora community began some of that work, I think I can safely say we'd jump at the chance to work and get it merged ASAP. > > > > Please feel free to loop me in if there are questions, I genuinely think you could be doing a lot of this very quickly with current master of openshift-ansible. > > +1 - Thanks > > This is something we're hoping to have at least a proof of concept in > working order by Flock, so the time tables are definitely near-term. Now that is a tight deadline, but I don't see why Devan and myself couldn't help facilitate changes needed. > > -AdamM > > > _______________________________________________ > > cloud mailing list > > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

by Adam Miller

Hello all, Hot off the heels of Fedora Cloud WG (well kind of ... little lag time in there) I took an action item during the Cloud WG Weekly Meeting to write up a proposal for the Fedora Council on what was being called "Project Foosion" during the Cloud FAD. In an attempt to both not get into legal trouble with Foosion Software[0] (yes, I know the website isn't working yet but it does appear to be a software company) and in hopes the name would not actually stick because it's silly, I've simply renamed it "Project FAO" where the FAO stands for Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift. We can properly paint the bike shed when there is actually one standing and in need of a coat of paint (i.e. - we at least have a working PoC). In the mean time, please everyone go to the current Draft Objective page and offer comments, feedback, and snide remarks. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO Thank you, -AdamM [0] - http://foosion.net/

7 years, 9 months

4
5
0 / 0

Minutes from 7/20

by Jason Brooks

================================== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg ================================== Meeting started by jbrooks at 17:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-07-20/fedora_clou... . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (jbrooks, 17:00:17) * discuss Post-GA Cadence (jbrooks, 17:02:39) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155 (jbrooks, 17:03:01) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/138 (kushal, 17:09:32) * ACTION: jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo (jbrooks, 17:23:22) * issue 136 https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136 (jbrooks, 17:25:01) * other open items (jbrooks, 17:28:12) * open floor (jbrooks, 17:38:57) Meeting ended at 17:57:09 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jbrooks * jbrooks to update / run down issues around two-week repo * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * jbrooks (64) * dustymabe (57) * kushal (42) * jberkus (35) * maxamillion (20) * zodbot (17) * jzb (11) * walters (9) * bowlofeggs (7) * sayan (5) * jkurik (4) * scollier (2) * tflink (2) * nzwulfin (1) * trishnag (1)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud July 2016