September 2016 - cloud - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Matthew Miller

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:45:10PM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Just want to note that the user-facing edition offerings do not have > to reflect the SIG structure should a change happen. Good point. I hope we'd continue with Workstation, Server, and the planned Fedora Atomic/OpenShift cluster edition. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Cloud Atomic Server WGs

by Chris Murphy

Couldn't make the Cloud meeting but just skimmed the log; cross-posting to server@ list. How about combine Cloud and Server WGs into a new WG with three new sub groups: hardware, cloud, atomic? That way you get the benefit of one WG working on the big picture stuff that enables integration among the outputs. And you get collaboration that isn't possible by just cross posting emails on two lists. Curation of the outputs is enhanced so they're optimal when the products are used together, while not being exclusive to each other. The differences are minor tweaks in terms of payload, but e.g. cloud-init is not something most people in the Server WG probably know much about. So most of Cloud + Server overlaps with really vertical knowledge base needed to do the small tweaks that cause substantial product differentiation. On the issue of membership, anyone unavailable in the next 30 days should be dropped. There will be another time for their participation when they're available. I'd look into making it easy to rotate out WG members to avoid long periods of inactivity which inhibits others' ability to get stuff done, and avoid burn out when they've been on the WG too long. Maybe some WG seats should be ~18 months, and twice as many of those would be 1 release cycle. i.e. 1/3 of the seats are longer term, and 2/3 are short term. There's sufficient stability in FESCo to make frequent WG turnover a plus. -- Chris Murphy

7 years, 7 months

3
2
0 / 0

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

by Chris Murphy

This notification still seems broken. That page says: The latest two week build did not meet our testing criteria. The images available are from over 22 days ago. Check the Project Atomic blog for updates and information about Atomic blocker bugs. And the image available for download is https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/x86_64/is... On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:45 AM, <noreply(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-24-2016... > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-Atomic-24-2016... > > Thank you, > Fedora Release Engineering > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list -- cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Chris Murphy

7 years, 7 months

2
3
0 / 0

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-09-21

by Sayan Chowdhury

================================== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg ================================== Meeting started by sayan at 17:00:36 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-21/fedora_clou... . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (sayan, 17:00:48) * Action items from last meeting (sayan, 17:04:12) * ACTION: Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac (sayan, 17:06:19) * vagrant boxes fixups https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136 (sayan, 17:06:51) * design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP) https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/153 (sayan, 17:08:24) * make Fedora Atomic download page clearer https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/154 (sayan, 17:11:28) * Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155 (sayan, 17:55:09) * Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/156 (sayan, 17:56:20) * Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/168 (sayan, 17:58:18) * Open Floor (sayan, 18:00:00) * ACTION: jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day (sayan, 18:01:56) Meeting ended at 18:03:17 UTC. Action Items ------------ * Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac * jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jbrooks * jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day * **UNASSIGNED** * Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sayan (68) * dustymabe (63) * jbrooks (51) * maxamillion (30) * zodbot (24) * jberkus (23) * smooge (11) * kushal (10) * scollier (9) * bowlofeggs (5) * trishnag (3) * tflink (2) * subho (1) * nzwulfin (1) * rtnpro (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Sayan Chowdhury <https://sayanchowdhury.dgplug.org/> Senior Software Engineer, Fedora Engineering - Emerging Platform GPG Fingerprint : 0F16 E841 E517 225C 7D13 AB3C B023 9931 9CD0 5C8B Proud to work at The Open Organization!

7 years, 7 months

3
2
0 / 0

[cloud] #168: Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#168: Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base ------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: scollier | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: OpenShift Origin Image | Keywords: meeting ------------------------------------+--------------------- AIUI right now if you deploy OpenShift Origin on a Fedora Atomic host, it pulls down Origin running in CentOS based images. Perhaps we should port those images to Fedora. The images that the CentOS team are created are located here: https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline We would want to coordinate the effort with the images on Docker hub: https://hub.docker.com/u/openshift/ And figure how this fits into Fedoras build system. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/168> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 7 months

1
5
0 / 0

[cloud] #171: [VOTE] To mark recent failure on Atomic images as non blocking

by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets

#171: [VOTE] To mark recent failure on Atomic images as non blocking --------------------+-------------------- Reporter: kushal | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: --------------------+-------------------- You can view the error at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/606/output#227 Related bugzilla bus * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265295 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353688 We want to mark these issues as non-blocking. Can the WG members please vote in? (Aye, Nay, Abstain). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/171> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

7 years, 7 months

1
16
0 / 0

overlayfs for AFTER Fedora 25

by Dusty Mabe

In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26. I think this will work well because it will give us some time to allow people to "try" overlayfs in F25 (we should provide good docs on this) and then give us feedback before we go with it as default in F26. If the feedback is bad then maybe we wouldn't even go with it in F26, but hopefully that won't be the case. Thoughts? Dusty

7 years, 7 months

8
14
0 / 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup

by Dusty Mabe

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2016-09-21 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

F24 Atomic installer image suddenly showing pre-release warning

by Adam Williamson

This week, the F24 Atomic installer image suddenly started showing the pre-release warning: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375747 This will cause the openQA test for it to fail until it's fixed (or until I add a softfail workaround, which I can do if it can't be fixed quickly, but...) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

F24 autocloud failure should be fixed by https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2016.10-4.fc24

by Colin Walters

See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2016.10-4.fc24

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud September 2016