[atomic-wg] Issue #287: Identify group of people interested in maintaining
kubernetes
by Dusty Mabe
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
We're trying to balance the pros/cons of trying to have both kubernetes and origin in Fedora. We're trying to find a group of people interested in helping us maintain kubernetes within Fedora. This includes maintaining the rpm, fielding bug reports, making sure docs stay up to date, and trying to make sure upgrades work.
From our preliminary discussion i know a few people:
- @strigazi
- @dimtheo
- @jasonbrooks
- @jberkus
Can we get other people who are interested in helping out add their name to this issue?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
6 years, 9 months
Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-07-12
by Dusty Mabe
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-07-12/fedora_atom...
full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-07-12/fedora_atom...
===================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
===================================
Meeting started by dustymabe at 17:00:07 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-07-12/fedora_atom...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (dustymabe, 17:00:13)
* previous meeting action items (dustymabe, 17:04:08)
* dustymabe proposed a VFAD https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/294
(dustymabe, 17:05:48)
* dustymabe added update to kubernetes thread:
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287#comment-447645 (dustymabe,
17:06:22)
* dusty opened a ticket regarding mailing list/irc channel for
atomic/cloud working group: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295
(dustymabe, 17:07:00)
* fedora-minimal container image is in the fedora registry now
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/290 (dustymabe, 17:09:14)
* ACTION: maxamillion roshi to come up with guidelines for meeting
quorum for the atomic working group (dustymabe, 17:11:18)
* Start using new mailing list/IRC channel around f26 release time
(dustymabe, 17:11:44)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295 (dustymabe, 17:11:52)
* LINK:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-J...
(jbrooks, 17:29:35)
* lots of good discussion here - no real concensus (spelling?) -
continue discussion in ticket https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295
(dustymabe, 17:37:19)
* Atomic Host images omit many common locales that all other flavors
include (dustymabe, 17:37:28)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/282 (dustymabe, 17:37:34)
* jlebon worked on some items around this ticket which should address
adam's most pressing concerns (dustymabe, 17:38:41)
* Delivering Atomic Host via CI/CD pipeline (dustymabe, 17:39:07)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.o...
(dustymabe, 17:39:12)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Continuous_Integration_and_Deli...
(dustymabe, 17:39:18)
* LINK: https://upstreamfirst.fedorainfracloud.org/ (stefw,
17:44:56)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI (stefw, 17:46:43)
* some people have been looking at fedora build process/tooling for
fedora atomic and have some initial work links from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI (dustymabe, 17:47:45)
* there is a mailing list for the ci efforts in Fedora, that will
initially focus on the set of packages in atomic host:
ci(a)lists.fedoraproject.org (dustymabe, 17:50:55)
* open floor (dustymabe, 18:01:52)
* Fedora 26 Atomic host first release was yesterday please read the
announcement from projectatomic blog:
http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2017/07/fedora-atomic-26-release/
(dustymabe, 18:02:48)
Meeting ended at 18:03:36 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* maxamillion roshi to come up with guidelines for meeting quorum for
the atomic working group
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* maxamillion
* maxamillion roshi to come up with guidelines for meeting quorum for
the atomic working group
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* dustymabe (168)
* stefw (92)
* maxamillion (24)
* jberkus (23)
* zodbot (23)
* jbrooks (23)
* gholms (21)
* jdoss (9)
* jzb (9)
* sayan (9)
* walters (9)
* ksinny (6)
* miabbott (5)
* strigazi (2)
* tibbs (2)
* scollier (2)
* yzhang (2)
* rubao (1)
* bowlofeggs (1)
* pingou (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 9 months
[atomic-wg] Issue #197 `Change size of Root,
Docker partitions in F26 Atomic Host storage setup`
by Pagure
jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
The way it is now:
Currently, the rootFS is sized at 3GB, fixed, and the Docker partition is 40% of the remaining space. This causes new users to run out of disk space if they do layering, ostree unlock, install a bunch of system containers, or even just run up the logs, even if they have plenty of physical disk space.
My suggestion for a new default is:
* RootFS: 25% of disk space, with a minimum of 3GB and a maximum of 16GB
* Docker Partition: 50% of total disk space (or 65% of remaining space), min 2GB
* Unallocated: 25% of disk space.
This would mean, for a new install:
Disk Root Docker Unallocated
8GB 3GB 4GB 1GB
32GB 8GB 16GB 8GB
200GB 16GB 100GB 84GB
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/197
6 years, 9 months
[atomic-wg] Issue #294: VFAD: Docs Treasure Hunt
by Dusty Mabe
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Target Date: Last week of July
Let's have a VFAD to help us find all of our docs that exist in the wiki and create an index of all of them. I suggest we actually have the index as our README for atomic-wg in pagure as well as our landing page on the wiki, but this may prove problematic. Really it would be great if we could have wiki support markdown formatting so we can just replicate the content between both places.
I suggest that we have a short 30minute video session and then a period of IRC collaboration as people go off to find docs (food break can be in here somewhere for breakfast/lunch/dinner depending on where you are). Then we can close with another 30 minutes video session to recap and possibly identify missing documentation and create tickets to get those docs created.
This will help us lead up to the Docs workshop at FLOCK.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/294
6 years, 9 months