Send cloud mailing list submissions to
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists. fedoraproject.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cloud-request@lists.fedoraproject.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cloud-owner@lists.fedoraproject.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cloud digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Fedora 25 (Benson Muite)
2. Re: Fedora 25 (Chris Murphy)
3. Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? compose?
(Kushal Das)
4. [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
(dusty@dustymabe.com)
5. Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? compose?
(Kushal Das)
6. Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? compose?
(Dusty Mabe)
7. Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting (Kushal Das)
8. Re: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting
(Colin Walters)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:54:15 +0300
From: Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org>
Subject: Fedora 25
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Fedora Marketing team <marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org >
Message-ID: <195b12e8-187b-6bde-f2ad-8cac34212169@emailplus.org >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi,
If any of you use Fedora Atomic as a desktop, could you add a brief
overview of why and how (workflow) you do so here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points
For the typical Fedora workstation user, what is needed to migrate to
Fedora Atomic as a desktop? Does this make it easier to use remote cloud
resources?
Finally please also indicate any hosting providers for which atomic is a
one click install - this seems to be of interest for some users:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/what- about-atomic-fedora-centos-or- redhat-in-addition-to-coreos
Regards,
Benson
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:47:55 -0600
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Subject: Re: Fedora 25
To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Fedora Marketing team <marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org >
Message-ID:
<CAJCQCtRwBpbES_x6DJRQvsaZeLn_JSO-=PaLnm=PtsAYW=qEdw@mail. gmail.com >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If any of you use Fedora Atomic as a desktop, could you add a brief overview
> of why and how (workflow) you do so here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points
>
> For the typical Fedora workstation user, what is needed to migrate to Fedora
> Atomic as a desktop? Does this make it easier to use remote cloud resources?
These might be better asked on desktop@ list where the Workstation WG
and users can put in their 2 cents?
--
Chris Murphy
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:42:46 +0530
From: Kushal Das <mail@kushaldas.in>
Subject: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic
compose? compose?
To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Message-ID: <20160905151246.GA5163@kdas-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host.
Deployments:
● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02)
Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d4348d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649 a5df
OSName: fedora-atomic
GPGSignature: (unsigned)
fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04)
Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cff8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda14160 1481
OSName: fedora-atomic
GPGSignature: (unsigned)
Any idea anyone?
Kushal
--
Fedora Cloud Engineer
CPython Core Developer
https://kushaldas.in
https://dgplug.org
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: dusty@dustymabe.com
Subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID:
<20160905170003.8B75360A4003@fedocal02.phx2.fedoraproject. >org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2016-09-07 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting-1@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 23:36:24 +0530
From: Kushal Das <mail@kushaldas.in>
Subject: Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic
compose? compose?
To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Message-ID: <20160905180624.GA6840@kdas-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 05/09/16, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host.
>
> Deployments:
> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
> Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02)
> Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d4348d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649 a5df
> OSName: fedora-atomic
> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>
> fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
> Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04)
> Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cff8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda14160 1481
> OSName: fedora-atomic
> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>
Found more strange information.
I had installed the box from [1]. But, after booting this was the host
status.
# atomic host status
TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC
* 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
I remeber Dusty sending a related mail. But I do not remember if we
found the cause.
[1]
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/ x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-dvd- x86_64-24-20160820.0.iso
Kushal
--
Fedora Cloud Engineer
CPython Core Developer
https://kushaldas.in
https://dgplug.org
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:40:03 -0400
From: Dusty Mabe <dusty@dustymabe.com>
Subject: Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic
compose? compose?
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <6fc5ff8f-4f67-5732-0c47-93b717d7ef71@dustymabe.com >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 09/05/2016 02:06 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 05/09/16, Kushal Das wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host.
>>
>> Deployments:
>> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>> Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02)
>> Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d4348d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649 a5df
>> OSName: fedora-atomic
>> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>>
>> fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>> Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04)
>> Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cff8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda14160 1481
>> OSName: fedora-atomic
>> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>>
> Found more strange information.
>
> I had installed the box from [1]. But, after booting this was the host
> status.
>
> # atomic host status
> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC
> * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>
> I remeber Dusty sending a related mail. But I do not remember if we
> found the cause.
We think we fixed it (see thread at [1]). Will you please check the
latest generated isos and see if they are fixed?
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists. fedoraproject.org/thread/ L4EWWWL6HEV3UHOGI2GLERA5BOOD7I 43/# E2P5FE65LOFCNLAORFTVUKK2EVBN4F ML
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:29:07 +0530
From: Kushal Das <mail@kushaldas.in>
Subject: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <20160906065907.GA8823@kdas-laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
We can not ssh into the latest Fedora 25 based atomic images. While
booting one image in Openstack I got [1] as console output.
[1] https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/f25_notbooting1.png
Kushal
--
Fedora Cloud Engineer
CPython Core Developer
https://kushaldas.in
https://dgplug.org
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:18:09 -0400
From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Subject: Re: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting
To: Kushal Das <mail@kushaldas.in>, cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID:
<1473167889.409531.717130033.75A93EFC@webmail. >messagingengine.com
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 02:59 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We can not ssh into the latest Fedora 25 based atomic images. While
> booting one image in Openstack I got [1] as console output.
There were a few causes of this, but to level set, let's be sure that
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2016.9-1. fc25%20rpm-ostree-2016.7-4. fc25
is used for the treecompose.
One possible cause is that previous versions of rpm-ostree didn't
set up a container around dracut, and libkmod barfed on the lack
of /proc/modules, which caused no kernel modules to end up
in the initramfs.
Now rpm-ostree consistently uses bubblewrap which fixes it
for me.
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists. fedoraproject.org
------------------------------
End of cloud Digest, Vol 81, Issue 1
************************************