3:43 p.m.
People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but I feel
like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we could benefit
from some more overall planning anyway.
I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will
expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it should be
_our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) -- basically, the
things that we want or need to get done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work, and
prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting things on
(virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is literally
what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started. We should
systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and work items.
And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
8:58 p.m.
Hi,
This might be totally out of topic here to some extent, but I felt like I
had to ask.
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images for
open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms. I
know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Kindly do advice.
Thank you.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>wrote:
People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but
I feel
like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we could benefit
from some more overall planning anyway.
I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will
expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it should
be
_our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) -- basically, the
things that we want or need to get done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work,
and
prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting things on
(virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is literally
what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started. We should
systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and work items.
And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Skype: Frankie.Onuonga
twitter: Frankieonuonga
irc #freenode: Frankie.onuonga
9:29 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:58:44AM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building
images for
open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms. I
know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Well, in addition to the Red Hat connection, there's another key one -- it's
the only PaaS infrastructure we have packaged in Fedora right now. We
certainly want to support deploying *any* open source PaaS on Fedora Cloud,
but that's the main reason this one got on the list. The idea would be to
have a pre-configured image or set of images you could just boot up and be
ready to go. If someone is interested in working on this -- for OpenShift or
for any PaaS software -- that'd be cool.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
9:51 p.m.
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
I would love to but to be honest I do not think I am good enough just yet.
If I can assist someone or have someone point me in the right direction
then we are golden.
Kind Regards
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:58:44AM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
> In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images
for
> open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms.
I
> know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Well, in addition to the Red Hat connection, there's another key one --
it's
the only PaaS infrastructure we have packaged in Fedora right now. We
certainly want to support deploying *any* open source PaaS on Fedora Cloud,
but that's the main reason this one got on the list. The idea would be to
have a pre-configured image or set of images you could just boot up and be
ready to go. If someone is interested in working on this -- for OpenShift
or
for any PaaS software -- that'd be cool.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Skype: Frankie.Onuonga
twitter: Frankieonuonga
irc #freenode: Frankie.onuonga
12:35 a.m.
On Jan 27, 2014 8:58 PM, "Frankie Onuonga" <frankie.onuonga(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
This might be totally out of topic here to some extent, but I felt like I
had to
ask.
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images
for open
shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more
platforms. I know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea to
make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as
other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology
running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at some
point or is that out of scope?
-AdamM
Kindly do advice.
Thank you.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
>
> People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but I
feel
> like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we
could
benefit
> from some more overall planning anyway.
>
> I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will
> expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it
should
be
> _our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) --
basically, the
> things that we want or need to get done.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
>
> Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work,
and
> prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting
things on
> (virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is
literally
> what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started.
We
should
> systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and
work items.
>
> And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
>
> --
> Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Skype: Frankie.Onuonga
twitter: Frankieonuonga
irc #freenode: Frankie.onuonga
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
7:31 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35:16AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea
to
make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as
other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology
running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
We had decided that we wanted to at least initially focus on a generic "base
image" plus 2 to 4 images focused on specific solutions. The generic image,
of course, could be the foundation on which any PaaS is installed.
The thinking was that we would make an OpenShift-tailored image be one of
the 2-4 specific one. But if you don't think that's useful, we could take
that off the list. (I'm sure there's plenty of _other_ OpenShift work we
could put on the general todo, of course.) It doesn't strike me as useful to
have a generic-PaaS-focused spin -- that's the generic base already, isn't
it?
Maybe I'm just not getting what you guys are saying. :)
Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at
some
point or is that out of scope?
Out of scope for the Cloud _product_ and Cloud WG, *in* scope for the Cloud
SIG. And therefore I think in scope for this list, although maybe it would
be useful to tag or segment things in some way.
Hmmmm. Maybe the wiki isn't the best technology for this list -- I wonder if
we should use Trello (or the open source clone I saw some people were
working on?).....
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
7:34 a.m.
+1 for trello
On 29 January 2014 13:31, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35:16AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea to
> make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as
> other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology
> running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
We had decided that we wanted to at least initially focus on a generic
"base
image" plus 2 to 4 images focused on specific solutions. The generic image,
of course, could be the foundation on which any PaaS is installed.
The thinking was that we would make an OpenShift-tailored image be one of
the 2-4 specific one. But if you don't think that's useful, we could take
that off the list. (I'm sure there's plenty of _other_ OpenShift work we
could put on the general todo, of course.) It doesn't strike me as useful
to
have a generic-PaaS-focused spin -- that's the generic base already, isn't
it?
Maybe I'm just not getting what you guys are saying. :)
> Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at some
> point or is that out of scope?
Out of scope for the Cloud _product_ and Cloud WG, *in* scope for the Cloud
SIG. And therefore I think in scope for this list, although maybe it would
be useful to tag or segment things in some way.
Hmmmm. Maybe the wiki isn't the best technology for this list -- I wonder
if
we should use Trello (or the open source clone I saw some people were
working on?).....
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Vaidas Jablonskis
7:40 a.m.
On 01/29/2014 02:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vaidas Jablonskis
<jablonskis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for trello
I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out:
https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
josh
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
8:47 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Sam Kottler wrote:
> I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out:
https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
Yeah, I hadn't looked at that in a bit and wasn't sure if it was ready for
serious use. If it is, I'm all for it.
Let's add setting that up to that top of the todo list, then. :)
I'm off to FOSDEM and then meetings and meetings and meetings in Brno next
week and then Devconf. It's possible that I will have time (during one of
those lonnnng meetings?) to set it up. But if someone else wants to do it,
that would be *awesome*.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
9:36 a.m.
Hello,
I will try to install it on my OpenShift account this week before arriving
to FOSDEM to see if I can make it work.
So if I have problems it should be easier to finish it at FOSDEM.
See you soon at FOSDEM !
2014-01-29 Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Sam Kottler wrote:
> > I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
> Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out:
> https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
Yeah, I hadn't looked at that in a bit and wasn't sure if it was ready for
serious use. If it is, I'm all for it.
Let's add setting that up to that top of the todo list, then. :)
I'm off to FOSDEM and then meetings and meetings and meetings in Brno next
week and then Devconf. It's possible that I will have time (during one of
those lonnnng meetings?) to set it up. But if someone else wants to do it,
that would be *awesome*.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
11:06 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:36:30PM +0100, Bertrand Juglas wrote:
Hello,
I will try to install it on my OpenShift account this week before arriving
to FOSDEM to see if I can make it work.
So if I have problems it should be easier to finish it at FOSDEM.
Hi Bertrand! Any luck with this? This will be a really useful resource and
I'm looking forward to it. :)
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
3705
days inactive
3735
days old
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Adam Miller -
Bertrand Juglas -
Frankie -
Josh Boyer -
Matthew Miller -
Sam Kottler -
Vaidas Jablonskis