Hello, I'm trying to run quantum-setup-server, but it fails as it requires openvswitch which I do not have installed. Now, I could install that, but is it really required for a controller only server?

On 28.01.2013 21:05, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 01/28/2013 09:50 PM, Nux! wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to run quantum-setup-server, but it fails as it requires >> openvswitch which I do not have installed. >> Now, I could install that, but is it really required for a >> controller only server? >> > > It should only require the OpenvSwitch plugin/ I think that this > requires the openvSwitch. We should open a bug to fix this. > Thanks > Gary Yep, the plugin requires openvswitch, this is "new", I remember this wasn't the case a month or two ago; you guys are probably getting ready for EL 6.4; but anyway, quantum-server-setup should not require it, what if people want a controller node only? I'll just continue with the instructions in the quantum-server-setup, skipping the vswitch part for now.

Lucian

On 01/29/2013 01:11 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 01/29/2013 01:06 AM, Nux! wrote: >> On 28.01.2013 21:05, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> On 01/28/2013 09:50 PM, Nux! wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to run quantum-setup-server, but it fails as it requires >>>> openvswitch which I do not have installed. >>>> Now, I could install that, but is it really required for a >>>> controller only server? >>>> >>> It should only require the OpenvSwitch plugin/ I think that this >>> requires the openvSwitch. We should open a bug to fix this. >>> Thanks >>> Gary >> Yep, the plugin requires openvswitch, this is "new", I remember this >> wasn't the case a month or two ago; you guys are probably getting >> ready for EL 6.4; but anyway, quantum-server-setup should not require >> it, what if people want a controller node only? >> I'll just continue with the instructions in the quantum-server-setup, >> skipping the vswitch part for now. > I have opened a bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905305 > Thanks See comments I've added to the bug regarding the explosion of sub-packages this could lead to. I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but we need to weigh the pros and cons of tripling the number of packages.

-Bob > Gary > >> Lucian >> > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud