https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733344
Bug ID: 1733344 Summary: Container Review Request - coreos-assembler - Tooling container to assemble CoreOS-like systems Product: Fedora Container Images Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Container Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: walters@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: container-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Container Build Info URL: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler Description: Tooling container to assemble CoreOS-like systems Fedora Account System Username: walterse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733344
--- Comment #1 from Colin Walters walters@redhat.com --- er, that should be: Fedora Account System Username: walters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733344
Jonathan Lebon jlebon@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlebon@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Lebon jlebon@redhat.com --- This is still desired. Can we get a review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733344
Athos Ribeiro athoscribeiro@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |athoscribeiro@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |athoscribeiro@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733344
--- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro athoscribeiro@gmail.com --- Hi,
Which of the Dockerfiles in the upstream repo should we review?
Moreover, I do not see the required labels in any of them.
Finally, the Dockerfile in question seems to be shipping non-RPM packaged software in it, which seems to go against the guidelines in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/containers/guidelines/guidelines/
container-review@lists.fedoraproject.org