Le 27/03/2020 à 08:04, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> On Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:09:21 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
>> Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
>>> Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
>>>> On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
>>>>>> Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
>>>>>>> On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger
wrote:
>>>>>>>> I've had a look to the above issue and it's not
the same, the failing build
>>>>>>>>
requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo
>>>>>>>> which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
>>>>>>> How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we
wouldn't have metadata
>>>>>>> pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pavel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate
or help
>>>>>> more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
>>>>> This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
>>>> Thanks for the link!
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s)
were
>>>> correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the
metadata
>>>> referenced non-existing files?
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
>>> I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an
the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
>>
>>
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-vir...
> Thanks for letting us know, I filled CentOS bug report:
>
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
>
> And perhaps we should invent some easy-to-tweak DNS mirror blacklist on
> builders (e.g. etc/hosts hacks). This is going to be discussed on Monday
> team meeting...
Hi,
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for
epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't
been careful enough in my proofreading
JM
> Pavel
>
>> JM
>>
>>> JM
>>>
>>>> Pavel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahoste...
*Jean-Marc LIGER*
Chef du Service Informatique
UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre
15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06
+33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
<