On Qui, 2016-10-13 at 10:56 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Could we have copr for F25 ? and in the future for other
> > > > > branched
> > > > > repos ? Please .
> > > > There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.
> > > I guess I understand; Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-
> > > x86_64
> > > repository
> > > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
> > I'm checking now , yes, none of my project have f25 buildroots
> > enabled,
> > when f25 was created, projects should (IMHO) inherited same
> > configuration of rawhide .
> >
> > So yes ," Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 repository
> > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ".
>
> And checking other projects in copr , all projects that I checked
> also
> don't have f25 buildroots enabled , so maybe it not a bad idea
> apply
> the rule right now .
After off-list discussion with Copr admins, this is already
implemented,
should be simple as `./manage.py rawhide_to_release A B` run by copr
administractor, though I haven't had a chance to experiment with it
yet.
(Now also to the list)
yes , I remember that [1] , now that we have one disynchronization ,
may be we should have this as a tool for each user :) (joking).
but if user/project don't have any F25 buildroot maybe can be applied ,
I don't know , as have to decided how do that or if do that .
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahost...
Pavel
--
Sérgio M. B.