On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:50:01AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:15:32PM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
I don't think requiring that user to use 'git clone' is problematic. (Is the concern that this specific user may not have the knowledge or software tools to do it?)
What if the sources are only available under a proprietary source code management system which requires $$$ to obtain?
Though I suppose it could be made clearer, the requirement that the Corresponding Source be made available 'at no charge' to me is inconsistent with requiring someone to use a non-gratis tool to get a copy of the Corresponding Source (with no other at-no-charge option). GPLv2 and GPLv3 are certainly no clearer on this point.
- RF