Hi folks,
Let's follow the traditional style guide for Python, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/.
I think we've been close to this historically, if there are places where the code is off we can fix it over time. Or, if there is a consistent deviation throughout the code we can document it and retain the deviation.
I'll be playing with pylint soon, I think it has an option for enforcing PEP 8. We'll see what it says.
Best,
Trevor
Oops, replied to the wrong email the first time
--
And if you're looking for a less dense version of PEP 8 that calls out the highlights, here is one link that summarizes (I'm sure there are others)
http://python.net/~goodger/projects/pycon/2007/idiomatic/handout.html
Trev
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 10:43 -0500, Trevor McKay wrote:
Hi folks,
Let's follow the traditional style guide for Python, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/.
I think we've been close to this historically, if there are places where the code is off we can fix it over time. Or, if there is a consistent deviation throughout the code we can document it and retain the deviation.
I'll be playing with pylint soon, I think it has an option for enforcing PEP 8. We'll see what it says.
Best,
Trevor
cumin-developers mailing list cumin-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cumin-developers
cumin-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org