September 2013 - Design Suite - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1005906] Review Request: heisenbug-kde-theme - Heisenbug KDE Theme

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005906 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |kde-settings-20-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-09-17 22:19:33 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- kde-settings-20-1.fc20, schroedinger-cat-kde-theme-18.91.6-2.fc20, heisenbug-kde-theme-19.90.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5ng4ocTuFz&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 --- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> --- Be sure to examine the arm error. Consider consulting upstream or excluding the architecture. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FoVWU2On32&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 --- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5944264 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k6ppG7WWGh&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ib54003@fedorapro | |ject.org) --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== Issues ====== * FHS: Shouldn't plugins go to /lib? Is that doable? * Remove shell scripts from icons folder ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [!]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. Still not quite sure about this one. Shouldn't plugins go to /lib? Is that doable? [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. knotter-data requires bash, as it contains some scripts no longer needed. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in knotter- data Cannot be %{?_isa} on noarch. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: knotter-0.9.4-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm knotter-data-0.9.4-3.fc18.noarch.rpm knotter-0.9.4-3.fc18.src.rpm knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) customizable -> customization knotter.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Knotter knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US knotworks -> notworks, k notworks, knot works knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable knotter-data.noarch: W: no-documentation knotter.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) customizable -> customization knotter.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Knotter knotter.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US knotworks -> notworks, k notworks, knot works knotter.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint knotter-data knotter knotter-data.noarch: W: no-documentation knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) customizable -> customization knotter.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Knotter knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US knotworks -> notworks, k notworks, knot works knotter.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- knotter-data (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash knotter knotter (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): knotter-data libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtScript.so.4()(64bit) libQtSvg.so.4()(64bit) libQtXml.so.4()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- knotter-data: knotter-data knotter: knotter knotter(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/knotter/0.9/knotter-0.9.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 5e5fbda3b051f3724f9aa6e5c1223626f4a8147c6f4ce8a7de245780dba0716b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5e5fbda3b051f3724f9aa6e5c1223626f4a8147c6f4ce8a7de245780dba0716b Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (eaf16cd) last change: 2013-05-30 Command line :./try-fedora-review -b 996209 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=22AmIJEj5I&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 --- Comment #8 from Benedikt Schäfer <ib54003(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Spec URL: http://ib54003.fedorapeople.org/rpm/knotter/f19/knotter.spec SRPM URL: http://ib54003.fedorapeople.org/rpm/knotter/f19/knotter-0.9.4-3.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tdquLvnyST&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 Benedikt Schäfer <ib54003(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ib54003@fedorapro | |ject.org) | |needinfo?(ib54003@fedorapro | |ject.org) | --- Comment #7 from Benedikt Schäfer <ib54003(a)fedoraproject.org> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6) > Benedikt, if you need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Sorry, i was very very busy at the last time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1mr332rGsQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 996209] Review Request: knotter - A free and open source customizable interlace designer

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996209 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> --- Benedikt, if you need any help, don't hesitate to ask. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vdsuIrve4M&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1005906] Review Request: heisenbug-kde-theme - Heisenbug KDE Theme

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005906 Bug 1005906 depends on bug 1006041, which changed state. Bug 1006041 Summary: Review Request: heisenbug-backgrounds - Heisenbug desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006041 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mRcaEODiYO&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1006041] Review Request: heisenbug-backgrounds - Heisenbug desktop backgrounds

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006041 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |heisenbug-backgrounds-19.90 | |.0-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-09-13 23:09:52 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- heisenbug-backgrounds-19.90.0-1.fc20, desktop-backgrounds-20.0.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L85IZfyaOc&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1000010] Review Request: python-PyRSS2Gen - A Python library for generating RSS 2.0 feeds

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000010 --- Comment #8 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> --- Thanks Mario, that got me testing with python3. This release should work for both python and the python3 subpackage. Spec URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-PyRSS2Gen.spec SRPM URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-PyRSS2Gen-1.1-4.fc21.src.rpm Description: A Python library for generating RSS 2.0 feeds. Fedora Account System Username: immanetize -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Design Suite September 2013