On 06/22/2009 02:18 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 14:05 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
I see you consciously changed "general audience" to "men audience", I think is better with "general". Why? because it is not really targeted at men, just at our general audience (which happens to be> 90% men, but this just happen to be that way)
Er... that was rather subconscious... Some thought shortcut: "women and children are covered, what remains are men". Feel free to correct it back to the "general audience".
Changed. When we label it as "for men", there is an unwanted connotation like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men%27s_magazines