Into the package just so i could test it, and there is a scratch build here.
WE are going to have to rush to be able to get this sorted before Freeze,
but if we can get a concensus on which wallpapers to add, i can respin the
package, and try to get it in there.
there is a scratchbuild of the package in progress here:
cheers,
ryanlerch
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:30 PM, S.Kemter <sirko.kemter(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just some notes
>>>
>>> @zoltan we definitely need no new wallpaper package, we have to many
>>> different packages already
>>>
>>> @matt there is no problem, you just need to know the package name you
>>> can install older ones still in newer releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> at both what Ryan has reached with the WG is already a huge step
>>> forward. We had several attempts to make our supplemental wallpaper better
>>> visible. Currently they are not shown in the workingstation by default its
>>> the old ones from GNOME which is always shown there. You might also think
>>> that we not just deliver GNOME as other DE as well so you have a lot of
>>> people sitting on the table when you want to reach a change.
>>>
>>> So what we not need are new ideas like add older default wallpaper,
>>> what we need is a consens with all the DE people not thinking to much as
>>> KDE, XFCE or whatever environment as more thinking, whats the best for
>>> Fedora.
>>>
>>> The optimum would be that each release the package is shown in the
>>> wallpaper settings but get the GNOME people agree to that is the hard part,
>>> so Ryans achievement is already a step forward in the right direction. So I
>>> am happy with it.
>>>
>>> The question is more how we select now the 15, just take the best 3 of
>>> last 5 releases or make a new election? To make an election and get it
>>> packaged so we can have that for F26, its just a short time. So working on
>>> that and not come up with new ideas is more helpful
>>>
>>
>>
>> IMHO, the best way would be for the members of the design team to pick
>> the set. This way we can choose the highest quality images, as well as
>> ensuring we have a good range of image types, and colors. We don't want to
>> have all mountain vistas, or ship a set were all the images are primarily
>> the same color.
>>
>> cheers,
>> ryanlerch
>>
>
>
> Just a heads up too,
>
> I have created a quick set of images that we might be able to use as a
> starting off point:
>
>
https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-supplemental-wallpapers-index/picks.html
>
> Additionally, I have the packaging all set up and ready to go if and when
> we decide to do this
>
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-design/fedora-workstation-backgrounds
>
> --ryanlerch
>
Any thoughts on this? It would be awesome to get this into the 26 Beta.
--ryanlerch
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> br gnokii
>>>
>>> Am 27.04.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Ryan Lerch:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Matthew Miller <
>>> mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:41:05AM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
>>>> > 3. Remove all the other wallpapers we currently ship and create
a
>>>> new
>>>> > set of the 15 wallpapers from the previous Fedora supplemental
>>>> wallpapers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about also including a few of the non-supplimental wallpapers from
>>>> previous releases? I personally really like F24 and F21, and the F17
>>>> fireworks seem almost iconic. Plus, FC5 (although the 3d-button look on
>>>> the logo seems dated.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO, these wallpapers are tied to the branding of each individual
>>> release, so
>>> I would be worried about including these as the standard wallpapers on
>>> a default
>>> install. The supplemental wallpapers don't really have the same
>>> connection to
>>> an individual release, and since we have a large back catalog of
>>> approved, properly
>>> licenced images, this seemed like a good place to base our search on.
>>>
>>> One thing to investigate here, however, is should we look into better
>>> ways of exposing
>>> the wallpapers packaged in Fedora to the user? Currently, these
>>> wallpapers are not shown
>>> in Software, and the only way to get them is to know the correct
>>> package name / fedora release
>>> name to install, and use DNF. They aren't really "software", so
not
>>> sure if they fit in the Software
>>> app, although we do have Fonts in there, but the experience provided
>>> there for searching
>>> for fonts can feel a bit clunky at times too.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> ryanlerch
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthew Miller
>>>> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
>>>> Fedora Project Leader
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> design-team mailing list -- design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to design-team-leave(a)lists.fedora
>>>>
project.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> design-team mailing list -- design-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to design-team-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>